1m ago16.04 AEST
Rogers takes Patterson to evidence by child protection worker,
Katrina Cripps, that Patterson told her she invited her lunch guests over for advice about approaching a medical issue with her children on 1 August 2023.
Patterson says she “wouldn’t have put it like that because that wasn’t the reason I invited people”.
“Cripps is wrong, is she?” Rogers asks.
“Yes,” Patterson says.
Patterson says she told Cripps a medical issue had been discussed at the lunch. But she says she did not tell her a discussion of a medical issue was the reason for the lunch.
Rogers says
Ian Wilkinson’s evidence was that Patterson told her guests she was anxious about sharing her medical news with her children.
She asks if Patterson told her lunch guests she was anxious about telling her children.
“I think it’s more accurate that I had been talking to them about how to manage the children,” Patterson says.
1m ago16.05 AEST
Rogers says: “I suggest you never thought you would have to account for this lie about having cancer because you thought your lunch guests would die.”
“That’s not true,” Patterson replies
1m ago16.05 AEST
Patterson asked about relationship with estranged husband
Rogers turns to question Patterson about her relationship with her estranged husband, Simon.
She says Simon gave evidence in the trial that he noticed a change in their relationship when Patterson discovered he had listed himself as “separated” in his tax return in late 2022.
Patterson says there was a change but it “happened a bit later, a few weeks later”. She says the tax return conversation was in October 2022.
“But I didn’t perceive a change in the relationship until the end of November,” she says.
This blog is now closed
www.theguardian.com