I agree with you.When she gave that false statement letter to the media, I saw she was trying to manipulate social perceptions of how people saw her. She was also playing the victim "being painted as an evil witch", when most people would be absolutely devastated for the people they "accidentally" killed.
I think therefore, there is a higher than normal chance she will take the stand.
After this statement, the prosecution finishes their examination and we bid farewell to Dr Tom May."What can you say about the smell of death cap mushrooms as they age or dry?" Dr Rogers asks.
"When they're first collected there's no particular smell," Dr May says.
"I have dried death cap mushrooms on a number of occasions and I have found their smell to be very unpleasant."
It also doesn't explain why she lured them there with a fake cancer diagnosis or wiped her phone, etc, etc.
Dr Truong says she told Dr Muldoon it was "probably impossible" to be death cap mushrooms, due to them only growing in the wild and being unable to be cultivated."I told her based on this particular photograph, I would not be able to give her identification," Dr Truong says.
"She said they had been bought from a supermarket and … a Chinese shop I believe."
"I also told her there were absolutely no sightings of death cap mushrooms during the last months," Dr Truong says.
"Based on the information I received, it was highly unlikely to be a case of death cap mushroom poisoning."
She then re-examined it the next day at the Royal Botanic Gardens, again using a microscope."Did you find any death cap mushroom pieces?" Dr Rogers asks.
"I didn't," Dr Truong says.
She tells the court the only mushrooms she found were field mushrooms that are commonly found at supermarkets."Did you find any signs of death cap mushrooms?" Dr Rogers said.
"No, I didn't," Dr Truong says.
So does that mean they were in the gravy then?Beef Wellington leftovers had no death cap mushrooms, expert says
By Judd Boaz
At 5pm that afternoon, Dr Truong says she received a message informing her a package had been dropped off for her at the Royal Botanic Gardens.
The package contained large resealable bags with food inside. Dr Truong organised for the leftovers to be brought to her house.
She analysed the mushroom in the leftovers under a microscope.
She then re-examined it the next day at the Royal Botanic Gardens, again using a microscope.
She tells the court the only mushrooms she found were field mushrooms that are commonly found at supermarkets.
I don't think so, just that the "left over " ones had no death caps, the ones she feed to her kids the next day, the ones the cop fished out of the bin.........So does that mean they were in the gravy then?
IMO it could mean several things, including Erin allegedly serving herself an untainted beef Wellington and disposing of the tainted leftovers in another fashion.So does that mean they were in the gravy then?
She originally 'claimed' that she bought the mushroons from a Chinese grocer and Woolworths. She has since 'admitted' that these were lies and that she herself foraged for the poisonous mushrooms. Admitted was used in the right context in my original![]()
But that has exactl6 the same consequences as not guilty.Indeed not, if she's guilty, as I believe she is. But if one juror disagrees, I don't want her declared "Not Guilty". I'd much rather "Not Proven".
I don't think there was any gravy IMOSo does that mean they were in the gravy then?