In a hypothetical situation where EP was granted an appeal which resulted in a retrial (which I hope will not occur), would the evidence of Simon's alleged poisoning be again suppressed? Would the prosecution again be prevented from including the alleged manslaughter of Simon in the same trial as the murders?
A lot of us knew about the suspected poisonings of Simon prior to this trial (though not some of the finer details until now), but how ridiculous would it be to suppress it for a second time. Does the Justice system think they have mastered the art of selective memory wiping of the populous. Do they think they have a memory wiping device like used in the Men-in-Black movie franchise? Do they think that we all live in an Australian media bubble?
If I could have it my way, I would not allow suppression of any evidence whatsoever, including prior convictions. Let it all hang out in the open and let the jury decide, not the Judge.
A lot of us knew about the suspected poisonings of Simon prior to this trial (though not some of the finer details until now), but how ridiculous would it be to suppress it for a second time. Does the Justice system think they have mastered the art of selective memory wiping of the populous. Do they think they have a memory wiping device like used in the Men-in-Black movie franchise? Do they think that we all live in an Australian media bubble?
If I could have it my way, I would not allow suppression of any evidence whatsoever, including prior convictions. Let it all hang out in the open and let the jury decide, not the Judge.



