- Joined
- Apr 24, 2025
- Messages
- 1,705
- Reaction score
- 21,903
Before this can be fully speculated on, I'd like to know more about how good the tests are. The only reason I say this is because we know some of the deceased never tested positive for poisoning and yet we know they were poisoned. Are the samples simply too small to pick it up every time?
If they are more reliable than this and therefore there was a full BW without any poison in it, then it is right to enquire what she was playing at.
I've never fully discounted the idea that she didn't expect they would all get as sick as they did, and she got the dosage wrong. This was always based on the idea that killing 4 people would have always been hard to explain. A more mixed bag, with some dying and some getting ill (into which she fit in with her diahorrea) would have been easier to explain as a tragic accident. Who knows, had Simon attended maybe one other guest would have been given a non-poisoned BW as well.
It's all pure speculation of course, and we'll never fully know what she intended. If however, she did intend to kill 5 people in cold blood, which most people believe, another full BW without any poison is something that would need explaining.
The DC toxins can leave the body within 48 hours, but the poignant point about the testing other than the timing, is that Gail and Heather had elevated liver enzymes and damaged livers. Erin had nothing like it.
There’s not just one test to determine poisoning. It’s a combination of all testing and presentation IMO