- Joined
- Jun 26, 2023
- Messages
- 1,827
- Reaction score
- 11,568
From a previously linked article re the search by bring them home charity. It stated mbm was asked by the rcmp if items found were belonging to the kids or items of interest. She replied no .so therefore the items were considered useless to the investigation
Firstly is it common for this to happen ,I would have thought that any items gathered would be bagged up and independently tested to see if they had relevance or not . I found it strange that a disappearance considered suspicious ( quoted by rcmp in articles previously linked and recalled from memory ) would allow a person present on the morning to verify items by photograph to see if evidence is relevant or not??
Secondly if they are not being tested or bagged up how would investigators know if they were discarded by a potential perp unknown to the children. ? Or if they had stains or dna belonging to the children or a potential perp invisible to the naked eye .
It just seemed odd considering there is no leads in the investigation for any theory to be plausible atm
Firstly is it common for this to happen ,I would have thought that any items gathered would be bagged up and independently tested to see if they had relevance or not . I found it strange that a disappearance considered suspicious ( quoted by rcmp in articles previously linked and recalled from memory ) would allow a person present on the morning to verify items by photograph to see if evidence is relevant or not??
Secondly if they are not being tested or bagged up how would investigators know if they were discarded by a potential perp unknown to the children. ? Or if they had stains or dna belonging to the children or a potential perp invisible to the naked eye .
It just seemed odd considering there is no leads in the investigation for any theory to be plausible atm