CANADA Canada - Jack, 4 & Lilly Sullivan, 6, Vulnerable, wandered from home 10am, Gairloch Rd, Landsdowne Station, Pictou County, NS, 2 May 2025 #7

  • #1,041
  • #1,042
Did the RCMP retain it to conduct forensics, do you know?
No idea. It was said it was towed to her (for her to get it back). I think that came from DM though.
 
  • #1,043
I don’t know the source for Malehya getting a “new car” other than being mentioned on these threads. Lexiintoronto maybe you remember? The only thing I recall is a photo of the yard with two or three vehicles parked in it and one didn’t have a license plate. Anyone? What do we know about a new car and how could MBM pay for it, if not given to her? Hopefully the source is not FB.

In Canada either the dealership arranges registration as a courtesy or the new owner must obtain a licence place and insurance prior to driving it off the lot.

In Nova Scotia: If it is a private sale of a vehicle and the purchaser does not have valid plates to attach, a temporary permit is available from any of the Registry of Motor Vehicle offices throughout the province. For documentation required to obtain a temporary permit, see Temporary (Vehicle) Permit, Application Forms & Process. Temporary permits are valid for 30 days and the fee is $13.20

Service Nova Scotia - Registry of Motor Vehicles - Vehicle Transfer

So the vehicle may have been purchased up to 30 days earlier.
 
  • #1,044
In Nova Scotia: If it is a private sale of a vehicle and the purchaser does not have valid plates to attach, a temporary permit is available from any of the Registry of Motor Vehicle offices throughout the province. For documentation required to obtain a temporary permit, see Temporary (Vehicle) Permit, Application Forms & Process. Temporary permits are valid for 30 days and the fee is $13.20

Service Nova Scotia - Registry of Motor Vehicles - Vehicle Transfer

So the vehicle may have been purchased up to 30 days earlier.

Yes I forgot about temporary permits for transit. But in my experience their main function is when a vehicle is purchased out of province to be driven to the home province. The purchaser wouldn’t be able to buy registration in another province. But MBM’s grandmother lived in N.S. and we don’t know when she or how she assisted MBM with the new vehicle. Was it purchased or gifted, we dont know much other than the registration date was shortly before the children went missing.
JMO
 
  • #1,045
I'm starting to think the kids may have been a flight risk or because they were deemed to have possible autism , the door being unable to be closed securely might have been part of a check list to be fixed by cps to ensure the safety of the kids . I'm wondering is this why the memo was sent so soon to higher ups .
Prehaps there was a follow up visit scheduled to see if certain criteria had been met and the visit wasn't scheduled in a certain timeframe to do this ,

If the wrench was a quick fix ,Prehaps this is why so much emphasis was put on the sliding door being the escape route , hardly going to publicly declare details of things flagged during a cps visit .

Although bears are making a return to nova scotia, there are very few and if a bear was hanging around why did mbm not state this in her televised plea on day 2 . Surely the kids being attacked by a bear would be front and centre in your mind if DM had to take security measures to prevent it coming into the trailer .

Another thing stated early on was DM was fixing a fence the Thursday evening. Was this also a requirement from cps to ensure the kids were secure ?

You’re right. Malehya told police they were known to wander.
IMG_9671.webp



 
  • #1,046
  • #1,047
This is the first time I've heard of MBM's car being towed to her mother's property.
 
  • #1,048
  • #1,049
You’re right. Malehya told police they were known to wander.
View attachment 620102



Insomnia has me reading these

A few notes of my own opinion and just confusion from the documents posted

- on page 7 it says Malehya was in and out of sleep, Lilly came in a few times and Daniel was sleeping the whole time and didn’t really wake up. Isn’t this a direct contradiction to what we have heard this whole time about Daniel sleeping?

- Malehya doesn’t remember what they did on Wednesday pg 8, Janie says that was the day they did laundry pg 7 Malehya’s google history proves Wednesday was quite a busy day pg 14. Daniel then says that laundry was Thursday pg 15. Daniel says he can’t remember what they did Wednesday pg 16. Detective says he believes Daniel was mistaken about when they did laundry since Malehyas google history shows it was Wednesdays pg. 17. Daniel confirms by looking at bank records pg 18 **I find this interesting given Daniel reporting the handler saying Daniel didn’t have enough detail about what happened Thursday - he seems to have a foggy memory or confusion

- Malehya says she went to bed Thursday and Daniel said he would clean the house that night. He didn’t so she doesn’t know what he did pg 8

- Daniel also got an email that kids were marked absent pg 16 **so this confirms he was listed in the school contacts

- Daniel’s polygraph pg 19 does say he was truthful but rest of sentence is redacted and we have no idea what it goes on to say. We have no idea if it indicates truth for certain things and not others or anything related. M’s polygraph pg 19 does state she as truthful for 4 questions. Everything is redacted. Detective does state that at this point in the investigation that there is no reason to believe criminal involvement but they poly Daniel and M to rule out - I personally cannot tell if “at this point” means at the point of the poly or when the report was released but to me it sounds more like at the point of the poly pg 20

- curious who the interview on May 9th was, name and info are all redacted pg 23

- curious as to why the info/time for M contacting her mother on Friday am is redacted pg 24 she does say she missed calls from M and learned from her own mother of them missing pg 24 but Daniel says M’s mom shows up very quick since she is an hour away, tells police they should check her phone to see when she called her mom pg 17 - ** this seems weird??

- looks like the request for their phones to be analyzed is submitted but there is no follow up in the report on findings






 
Last edited:
  • #1,050
It seems the children were in a vulnerable situation without adequate supervision - the kind of circumstances that predators often seek out.
 
  • #1,051
I wonder did LE base their assumption that it wasn't likely an abduction because of the isolation of the property but if that's all its based off , it seems to be a blinkered response because it was ruled out almost immediately and they have never spoke about the rationale behind that conclusion
It could also be an investigative tactic. Don't let the abductor(s) know that you're looking for them. Keep them unsuspecting so they stay in the area.
 
  • #1,052
- Malehya doesn’t remember what they did on Wednesday pg 8, (...) Malehya’s google history proves Wednesday was quite a busy day pg 14.
Whaaat????
Daniel says he can’t remember what they did Wednesday pg 16. Detective says he believes Daniel was mistaken about when they did laundry since Malehyas google history shows it was Wednesdays pg. 17. Daniel confirms by looking at bank records.
What the ever loving what? Is there something in the water there causing this level of.... uh... memory loss??
 
  • #1,053
  • #1,054
So MBM thinks Daniel saying the police was not doing enough to find her children, was an erratic behaviour?

Interesting.

Also: the kids were put to bed the last night before in their day clothes, brcause, according to MBM, all the rest of their clothing was in the bags after it was laundered at the grandma's. How much effort it takes to fish out two pairs of pj from these bags? And the laundry was on Wednesday. Bizarre, IMO.
 
  • #1,055
Whaaat????

What the ever loving what? Is there something in the water there causing this level of.... uh... memory loss??

This case stinks.
 
  • #1,056
On page 12 of 35 Malehya provided new information and says;
Malehya said Lily and Jack did not normally wander on their own. they would if *redacted* were there but not by themselves.

In context, it sounds like DM’s children, imo.
 
  • #1,057
In context, it sounds like DM’s children, imo.
I wonder if the redacted information is referring to DMs kids , as they were older and prehaps looked out for lilly and jack taking care that they didn't wander too far out of sight . But being older meant lilly and jack had s bit more freedom when they were around

I wonder did lilly and jack prehaps think that DMs kids were over in DMs relations for the weekend and tried to make their way there .

Would kids age 4 and 6 realise it was Friday if they were off school prehaps they thought it was the weekend as they had been off school 2 days at that point
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
8,870
Total visitors
8,986

Forum statistics

Threads
633,367
Messages
18,640,746
Members
243,508
Latest member
user314159
Back
Top