- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 13,395
- Reaction score
- 90,514
Law enforcement in both the US and in Canada very rarely if ever strongly express they "believe" someone is guilty of a crime or involved in that crime before they've collected enough evidence to both arrest *AND* achieve a conviction for said crime. That runs counter to good investigation.
This is why they are very very guarded about what they release as statements during the investigation. The statements are strategic in the investigation as well as attempts to calm the anxious public. They are very well trained in exactly how to say something and say it without saying something else. Its often in the interests of the investigation to keep the general public "off their tail" so to speak.
Judges issuing warrants also know how to "read" these statements when issuing warrants. There are ways of saying things without directly saying them. Judges also know FULL WELL the value and weight polygraphs carry, which is next to none. They are chiefly investigative tools meant to guide the investigation. You don't often see them used at trial for reason. Too many sociopaths "pass" them easily, though there really IS no actual pass or fail. Those words are for the uninitiated or those not trained in how polygraphs are utilized in investigations.
What you will not hear is "We believe the parent/step parent of the missing child is guilty of his disappearance" or "we believe Monique Tepe's ex-husband is involved in her murder" before they have gathered the evidence and effected an arrest. Except for the very rare occasion when its used *strategically* for the investigation (NOT for the curiosity of the general public) in order to flush out evidence like a suspected murderer being surveilled moving a body or murder weapon, it just isnt done. Defense lawyers know how to use the "locked in and didnt adequately investigate other suspects" to their advantage and some criminals have been acquited on that basis. Investigators and about all law enforcement officers are trained in this.
Just something to consider for those who want to keep the options open and not close any doors based on statements about polygraph tests.
It is what it is. Wishing it weren't so doesnt change that. Everything still comes back to "might, might not".
I don’t believe police in Canada and the US can be compared at all. Far more information is released in the US with every case I’ve followed. I assure you I’m aware of their processes. In Canada LE are absolutely quiet in releasing info throughout the investigation process up until the trial. But an example of what the RCMP did believe, maybe at one time, was that the children had wandered into the woods.