- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,755
- Reaction score
- 44,542
Do police officers normally give out snacks?
I thought LM was eating breakfast when nabbed.



Do police officers normally give out snacks?
I thought LM was eating breakfast when nabbed.
An intelligent murderer IMO. This helps prove to me that LM was mentally competent when he committed the murder of Brian Thompson and also shows me his attention seeking side in responding to his adoring fanboys/girls.Very well-written by an obviously intelligent person
![]()
Police in Pennsylvania pulled a fast one on Luigi Mangione when they arrested him at an Altoona McDonald's, according to his lawyer. Cops gave him a snack strictly so they could get his DNA, his attorney said.
Police also violated Mangione's rights, his lawyer now alleges, when they seized his bag and rifled through his belongings, telling the public they had found a "manifesto."
![]()
Pennsylvania police who arrested Luigi Mangione gave him a snack to get his DNA, lawyer says
Police in Pennsylvania pulled a fast one on Luigi Mangione when they arrested him at an Altoona McDonald's, according to his lawyer. Cops allegedly gave him a snack strictly so they could get his DNA.abc7ny.com
I guess I am missing the point. They got him a snack so they could take the wrapper and test if for his dna.Do police officers normally give out snacks?
I thought LM was eating breakfast when nabbed.
I guess I am missing the point. They got him a snack so they could take the wrapper and test if for his dna.
I still don't get the problem. Is the problem with the idea the police gave him a snack, or that they used that as a ploy to get his DNA?According to the CBS news, above, the objection is to LM being fed food and a soda **at the police station**.
When arrested, he was eating a hash brown in McDs.
I still don't get the problem. Is the problem with the idea the police gave him a snack, or that they used that as a ploy to get his DNA?
I don't understand why anyone has any problem with any of this. It seems pretty clear the police used this as a tactic to get dna.We are crossing one another…lol.
Are you asking about why his lawyers have a problem?
They think the police were setting him up I guess.
Or that it’s wrong to offer hima soda to get DNA.
LM would have disrobed by then, plus they no doubt took his wrappers from McDs.
Exactly. But his lawyers are trying to spin it as if they did something illegal.I guess I am missing the point. They got him a snack so they could take the wrapper and test if for his dna.
The "ploy". Guess they don't watch many true crime shows. Cops do this all the time. Nothing illegal about it. Mangione could have refused.I still don't get the problem. Is the problem with the idea the police gave him a snack, or that they used that as a ploy to get his DNA?
I guess they could say that since he was in custody, they couldnt do this with out his attorney. But I don't think it matters. Will this test be admissible in court? Probably not, but I don't think that was the purpose. I think they were just verifying they had the right person. They will have other dna samples for trial. This is just trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.The "ploy'. Guess they don't watch many true crime shows. Cops do this all the time. Nothing illegal about it. Mangione could have refused.
Yup! My cousin's murderer represented himself and tried that argument- that they couldn't use his DNA from his bar glass without his consent, but they had also obtained a cheek swab from him to corroborate, so it was a moot point. I got to watch that hearing. It was a wonderful moment.I guess they could say that since he was in custody, they couldnt do this with out his attorney. But I don't think it matters. Will this test be admissible in court? Probably not, but I don't think that was the purpose. I think they were just verifying they had the right person. They will have other dna samples for trial. This is just trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
Which is perfectly within their (LE) rights. Anything LE recovered from his Micky D's meal would have been eligible for LE to retrieve, as there would be no expectation of privacy on discarded or abandoned items right?I don't understand why anyone has any problem with any of this. It seems pretty clear the police used this as a tactic to get dna.
Exactly. I laughed when I saw that his defense team tried this tactic. Surprisingly there are people out there who actually thought it was illegal.Which is perfectly within their (LE) rights. Anything LE recovered from his Micky D's meal would have been eligible for LE to retrieve, as there would be no expectation of privacy on discarded or abandoned items right?
JMO
If he had thrown them away, he has no expectation of privacy. If he was eating when they arrested him, they probably would need a warrant. But to me, its just not that big of a deal. They knew he fit a description of who they were after, they could use multiple ways to get identification on him. Is he trying to deny who he is? No, so I just don't see how this really relevant at all.Which is perfectly within their (LE) rights. Anything LE recovered from his Micky D's meal would have been eligible for LE to retrieve, as there would be no expectation of privacy on discarded or abandoned items right?
JMO
Just curious as to why you think a warrant was needed if he was eating at the time of his arrest? LE does feed people during their interrogations. I've watched it many times.If he had thrown them away, he has no expectation of privacy. If he was eating when they arrested him, they probably would need a warrant. But to me, its just not that big of a deal. They knew he fit a description of who they were after, they could use multiple ways to get identification on him. Is he trying to deny who he is? No, so I just don't see how this really relevant at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.