no proof of that tbhExcept he was trying to sell another deal with another country out from under UK. Either way, it's now UK's responsibility for the next 100 years.
no proof of that tbhExcept he was trying to sell another deal with another country out from under UK. Either way, it's now UK's responsibility for the next 100 years.
It's so horrible to see 'the AMERICAN'S' when what t and his people have created. Not all on any level. I think the best buds showing what that means for us, will get the quiet ones up in arms, in their heads and hope they vote them out where they can, come state elections. A start, this has to be stopped and turned around, every single act that has been done and will be done.
People are saying that its a very similar situation and that Trump is acting like Chamberlain did.I suppose they also think Winston Churchill was the unelected leader of England during WWII.
It says something about a leader and a cause when they have to use propaganda to try to convince people they're right. It's eerie how so much of this is a repetition of Hitler's movement as they took over Germany and invaded Poland. Remember how they convinced everyone that Poland was to blame?
Why isn't UK threating to attack Russia if those kids aren't returned?You know one thing thats funny? Russia took hundreds or thousands of kids to Russia away from there family. Why isnt Trump threatening to attack Russia if those kids arent returned like he is with Gaza?
View attachment 567935
Is this rouge enough?
You should read the 100 yr deal with UK and Ukraine. It's available on the gov UK website. I'm surprised you didn't know about this already. JMO MOOno proof of that tbh
Respectfully, as someone who has worked in senior management of an investment firm, GDP stats don't come out until well after the fact. It's measured well after the fact. In contrast, the expenditure budget comes out well before the fact (as all budgets do). Budgets are forward looking.I'm familiar with GDP. Comparison require identical time frames in order to reach a hypothesis. The 2021outside of the time frame of the invasion, 2022. You need to compare 2024 GDP the 2024 expenditure budget.
Moo... And a little statistical nerdy
Israel is a NATO Nation. Hamas (GAZA) has limited military capabilities and no nuclear weapons. Hama has few allies, and they have very limited ability. There's little to no risk Hama could attack outside of its boundary.You know one thing thats funny? Russia took hundreds or thousands of kids to Russia away from there family. Why isnt Trump threatening to attack Russia if those kids arent returned like he is with Gaza?
We are not allowed into negotiations...and we havent threatened to attack another country for same reasonWhy isn't UK threating to attack Russia if those kids aren't returned?
I was not talking about that issue. I was talking about your assumption that they wasnt going to deal with America because of the Uk.You should read the 100 yr deal with UK and Ukraine. It's available on the gov UK website. I'm surprised you didn't know about this already. JMO MOO
Yes but you have to use for actual expenditures. Budgets change frequently and they move money from one pot to another often. That's why I suggested same previous years. MooRespectfully, as someone who has worked in senior management of an investment firm, GDP stats don't come out until well after the fact. The expenditure budget comes out well before the fact (as all budgets do).
Unfortunately they did thoughIsrael is a NATO Nation. Hamas (GAZA) has limited military capabilities and no nuclear weapons. Hama has few allies, and they have very limited ability. There's little to no risk Hama could attack outside of its boundary.
Moo
Thank you Southern. I think we all agree that Putin is a bad dude. He wants to take over democratic nations. We owe it to society to not let that happen, right?I agree. I think everyone with the exception of Putin wants a long-term peace agreement. I know Europe is worried. If fighting continues through Ukraine, Russia will be the back door of European countries. But if anyone, the US or European countries send in military troops, even acting as peacekeeper, there is grave risk of combat. All our leaders know this on both sides of the pond know this.
Ukraine has been in and out of conflict with Russia since 2014. No one has sent troops in any of these conflicts.
Putin has made it very clear if the US enters Ukraine, he considers it an act of war. We just can't go into war with Russia. It will result in nuclear weapons.
There are no guarantees, certainly not a piece of paper. It takes both parties working real hard to keep a ceasefire fire or a peace agreement. It can happen accidentally or intentionally. Russia is the time bomb.
Moo
You mean when Biden would say over and over again: "Don't!" ? LOL.The US has never been terribly concerned about military spending and foreign aid. Both parties GOP and DEM, have been more than willing to spend huge sums of money and US lives fighting (losing) conflicts around the globe. Money no object. Look at the 20+year war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now suddenly faced with confronting our worst enemy, PUTIN, knees are buckling in the Whitehouse and now feigned concern about money. I recall Trump announcing in his first campaign that the US nuclear weapon systems were defective. If so, why would he have announced that publicly? If not, why the lie? It is not hard to see that we are taking a stance of weakness. Trump has no respect here or abroad. Even if he is not complicit with Putin, he is seen as a weak fool by Putin. At least with Biden, the support of the US was seen as a constant threat, even if weak.
Well we did have some questions about the $40 million that went missing. I posted it at early. MooHe's been trustworthy since he was elected president. The US has had no problems with him. He didn't invade any neighboring countries, butchering innocent men, women and children. So there's that.
Honestly this is all a moot point since UK and Ukraine signed the 100-year deal in January. UK is now responsible for funding and providing security to Ukraine, and The UK will also be a preferred partner for Ukraine’s energy sector, including projects developing renewable energy sources, a critical minerals strategy and green steel production. Sounds like Zelensky has already agreed to a minerals deal. I don't know why Zelensky would want to pit the USA vs another country, but he has. Good for him, and good luck to the UK. Now I know why Zelensky said 3 times he would sign a deal with the USA and then refused. My neck is still sore for the daily whip lash of yes he would sign, no he wont. JMO MOO
No proof that he was involved with that tbhWell we did have some questions about the $40 million that went missing. I'm posted it at early. Moo
Thanks Southern. I haven't been able to follow every post. Could you post a link for that? Thank you in advance.Well we did have some questions about the $40 million that went missing. I'm posted it at early. Moo
As I understand it Europe will get to take over and do all the negotiations. I think we are out unless Z comes to his senses, and even then, who knows. imoWe are not allowed into negotiations...and we havent threatened to attack another country for same reason
Not sure thats the way it works tbh. I assume that Trump will still do negotiations. Not sure what Z is meant to do but I do know that if I was him I would not go to the White house without other leaders.As I understand it Europe will get to take over and do all the negotiations. I think we are out unless Z comes to his senses, and even then, who knows. imo