2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

[QueenD]

Does anyone follow this on Twitter? If so what is the best @ to follow?

I check here on first page and seen no links. Thanks.

 

[nursebeeme]

hhjp is having to read the whole thing to the dt! amazing~

 

[wenwe4]

HHBP: science in litigation science. Rule in Federal rules of evidence
Section 4 - intrepreting science data,
Section 5 - anaylsis of hair, control substances, paint & coating
Section 6 - methods of forensic science
7 -
8 - education and training

 

[logicalgirl]

HHJP giving a reading lecture about what the four prongs are - listing off what is and is not acceptable.....not looking patient....
Mr. Ashton has a valid point and question will be sustained unless you have a valid point - DS still going on and on...

 

[Softail]

The defense always seems to try to cite case law that simply does not apply. :banghead::banghead:

 

[sleutherontheside]

Wow...when the Judge reads to you like a bedtime story....just sit down.

 

[nursebeeme]

objection will be sustained unless dt can speak to one of the four prongs

 

[Chiquita71]

The judge is speaking: what is forensic science, next the forensic community, three: in evidence in litigation law and science. A section that talks about the frye standard, and a decision that is not valid in fl but judge says is interesting.

section four: interpreting scienctific data,...listing each section...

section six: performance in forensic science
eight: education and training
nine: med examiners
ten: finger print and homeland security

unless you have a specific section of this article which has some relvance of what you want to read...table of contents.

 

[MD MOMMY]

Objection sustained!!!!!!!!

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

HHBP: under Rameriz vs. state outline parts that courts are required to have all
four prongs. I am simply talking about Rameriz 2 . . . . . 1995 decision

JB & DS looking for papers

HHBP: curious as to the 4 steps we talked about . . . which one of the 4 or all 4 discovery?
DS: Number 1 - assist jury to understand the evidence, scientific expertise and methodolgoy
#2 the trial judge must decide on scientific principle -there are requirements/steps to gain certain acceptance

found the appellate document
http://vlex.com/vid/joseph-j-ramirez-vs-state-florida-appellee-20847844

 

[strawberry]

Does anyone follow this on Twitter? If so what is the best @ to follow?

I check here on first page and seen no links. Thanks.

Judgeperrysays...after the hearing at least.

 

[Chiquita71]

d sims speaks of chapter four.

Judge: you want section four to be considered by the court?

yes sir

judge: ja you have any objections?

(( I can't hear that mic)

 

[joypath]

IF this is the same article....(sorry missed the name) that LKB referenced in the past......it is a document that initiated exceptional discussion and a GAME PLAN for the future ...year future UPGRADING of the field of forensic science INCLUSIVE!

 

[wenwe4]

DS: Chapter 4 - interpreting scientific data - I think that is meaning of Frye.
HHBP: So you want the court to consider section 4
DS" yes sir =

 

[strawberry]

Hasn't he talked about this four-pronged test a few times now? C'mon!

 

[Chiquita71]

HHJP: it will be received in evidence for the purpose of considering section four.

 

[MD MOMMY]

I'll tell you what. If DS continues to speak as she is now, she will lose the jury in the first minute. She cannot simplify anything because she herself doesn't get it. BAD combo IMO.

 

[wenwe4]

HHBP: it will be received in evidence for the purposes of the content of section 4.

 

[faefrost]

here endeth the lesson. I get the impression that HHJP is not going to be giving anywhere near as much leeway today.

 

[FaerieB]

Does anyone follow this on Twitter? If so what is the best @ to follow?

I check here on first page and seen no links. Thanks.

@JudgePerrySays and @CFNews13Casey are both tweeting from the courtroom.