- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,266
- Reaction score
- 58,032
First, thank you so much for taking the time to summarize and transcribe key parts of the interview with SG. I listened to it last night, but it is great to have something to easily look back at for important points.RSBM
17:08 (talking about when they met with the FBI at the satellite office before BK was arrested and they laid out a profile)...it's going to look different than a crime where somebody sneaks in, gets out, doesn't leave a bunch of evidence, a bunch of blood trails out. Early on they said they think this individual picked this community, wouldn't be surprised if he was on Washington side hugging the border. (Talks about Lewis and Clark murders and FBI speculated the area could have been chosen because they don't have a history of IDing their serial killers.
I have always wondered if BK specifically crossed the state line to commit the murders, which I believe that he may have, and if there was a reason, and again, I believe that there might have been.
Any of you long timers here will likely remember a dedicated, verified poster, @Foxfire, who was a retired Atlanta fire department captain, and who volunteered with some search and rescue groups. He very often talked about the phenomenon called jurisdictional linkage blindness, which is the failure of law enforcement agencies to recognize or share information across jurisdictional boundaries, which can hinder investigations, particularly in cases of violent serial crimes. I am sure that, as a student of criminology, BK would be familiar with linkage blindness, even if he was not familiar with the nearby Lewis-Clark Valley murders., which he likely was. As far as we know, the King Rd murders were BK's first, but I think most of us here believe, had he not been caught, they would not have been his last. Did he cross state lines, believing that a department's jurisdiction stopped at the county/state line, and neighboring departments would not be full partners in working to solve the crimes? Did he think that the small towns of Moscow and Pullman would not be adequately trained and work together? Did he not realize that the FBI surely would be in on day 1, working side-by-side with local agencies? Had he not been caught, would his next murders have been in Moscow, or would he have chosen Pullman, or maybe ventured a little farther out? Would he have killed, back home, in Pa? Thankfully, it seems very likely that he will never be free to hurt anyone else.
Finally, if he did intentionally cross state lines to kill, that is just one more bad move on his part, as Washington abolished the death penalty in 2018, while Idaho is preparing a firing squad for him.
JMO
Last edited: