4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered, Bryan Kohberger Arrested, Moscow, Nov 2022 #108

Can anyone be as white as BK without altering the photo?

He looks like a ghoul. Oh wait! He is a ghoul.
I have to wonder if it's a combo of those blue-white LED bulbs many bathrooms have, substance abuse or other illness, and/or excitement? He looks giddy and not in a good way.. MOO
 
he has the pallor of a junky and that's why I wondered if he was using drugs again..he could be ghastly white from the shock of what he did. mOO
From what he did in terms of... forgetting the sheath. Maybe that registered with him, I don't think anything else did.

Was he generally pleased with himself, but at the same time realizing now he'd actually be the one to suffer?

I doubt that was part of the plan. I know some people think he left the sheath on purpose, I just don't think so. Had that been his true mindset, I'm guessing we'd be looking at a guilty plea now from him, but jmo.
 
I have to wonder if it's a combo of those blue-white LED bulbs many bathrooms have, substance abuse or other illness, and/or excitement? He looks giddy and not in a good way.. MOO
Most of the time when we see these photos in evidence, they're very low quality. This is very high as far as that goes, but it's still not going to be of the quality that's in discovery. This was just for purposes of a court filing, and the actual appearance may vary substantially.
 
Listed on p96 or p97 of the Case Summary; the State's Opposition the Defendant's Motion to Continue (June 5th 2025).

We should be able to read it soon! Hopefully the full document will be uploaded to the Cases of Interest page early next week.

In order to read the updated Case Summary I discovered you need to download the link rather than just click to open. Once downloaded I don't seem to be able to post a current link here.

 
Photos. FWIW
he has the pallor of a junky and that's why I wondered if he was using drugs again..he could be ghastly white from the shock of what he did. mOO
@minazoe

Compare BK's "ghastly white" bathroom selfie mere hrs after crime to
AP pic* ~ six weeks later, looking what ---

Tan, flush, sun-burned? IDK, maybe photoshopped?


_____________________________________________
* caption: "Bryan Kohberger (pictured at his extradition hearing in January 2023) is facing trial in August." bbm
 
Listed on p96 or p97 of the Case Summary; the State's Opposition the Defendant's Motion to Continue (June 5th 2025).

We should be able to read it soon! Hopefully the full document will be uploaded to the Cases of Interest page early next week.

In order to read the updated Case Summary I discovered you need to download the link rather than just click to open. Once downloaded I don't seem to be able to post a current link here.

Great catch, we should have it Monday.
 
The YouTubers are at it again. Several are claiming that BK has filed defamation lawsuits (one stating 16 in Adams County Washington, which also makes no sense). I think this is manufactured but I wanted to ask if anyone had any evidence of him filing? TIA
They've taken a mysterious filing, and created a fictional narrative around it. I'm not sure what it is, but it isn't going to be that.
 
Photos. FWIW

@minazoe

Compare BK's "ghastly white" bathroom selfie mere hrs after crime to
AP pic* ~ six weeks later, looking what ---

Tan, flush, sun-burned? IDK, maybe photoshopped?


_____________________________________________
* caption: "Bryan Kohberger (pictured at his extradition hearing in January 2023) is facing trial in August." bbm
Not sure we should get totally bogged down with nuances in tint, lighting, focus, etc., related to photos we are finding online. There is so much variance in digital file qualities (especially when potentially compressed by servers or copied in as a screen grab), our screen settings, phone v. computer viewing, and Mac v. PC. As someone UT mentioned, probably only true image is what’s in evidence 😄
 
They've taken a mysterious filing, and created a fictional narrative around it. I'm not sure what it is, but it isn't going to be that.

*snorts at those folks*

Three more seconds of work would have gotten the YTubers and the Twitterers the right info:

If you go to the Washington State court filings website and search by Kohberger, you see 17 filings with him as the plaintiff. 14 of them are in Whitman County from June 2, 1 from Whitman County on May 28, and one in Adams County on May 23. All of them are marked "archived--no docket info, cause--miscellaneous."

To me, those are all witness summons, just like the ones we saw for Pennsylvania a few days ago. It appears that these aren't being or aren't likely to be contested by the people being summoned--unlike what is happening in PA. That's why the PA ones have a court date--those 5 ppl are going to come and say why they shouldn't be required to go. If the WA ones aren't being contested, there doesn't need to be a court date put into the docket....just WA creating the warrant/summons and delivering them.

It's possible that they could be subpoenas for deposing them, like with BF, but that seems unlikely for AT to suddenly want to depose 17 ppl at this late date.
 
Last edited:
*snorts at those folks*

Three more seconds of work would have gotten them the right info:

If you go to the Washington State court filings website and search by Kohberger, you see 17 filings with him as the plaintiff. 14 of them are in Whitman County from June 2, 1 from Whitman County on May 28, and one in Adams County on May 23. All of them are marked "archived--no docket info, cause--miscellaneous."

To me, those are all witness summons, just like the ones we saw for Pennsylvania a few days ago. It appears that these aren't being or aren't likely to be contested by the people being summoned--unlike what is happening in PA. That's why the PA ones have a court date--those 5 ppl are going to come and say why they shouldn't be required to go. If the WA ones aren't being contested, there doesn't need to be a court date put into the docket....just WA creating the warrant/summons and delivering them.

It's possible that they could be subpoenas for deposing them, like with BF, but that seems unlikely for AT to suddenly want to depose 17 ppl at this late date.
Why the separate counties you think? Based on where these people live?
 
Not sure we should get totally bogged down with nuances in tint, lighting, focus, etc., related to photos we are finding online. There is so much variance in digital file qualities (especially when potentially compressed by servers or copied in as a screen grab), our screen settings, phone v. computer viewing, and Mac v. PC. As someone UT mentioned, probably only true image is what’s in evidence 😄

Not to mention, when you search for selfies BK took in years prior--it's clear the boy does NOT know how to adjust his flash setting or account for harsh lighting in the room/outside. Plenty of bad angles, glare, and wash out.

While I like to look for hidden meaning and clues as much as the next person, given the timing of his phone calls to his parents and the time of the photo, paired with the oddity of wearing a white button up dress shirt on a Sunday morning, that photo gives me more of a "here's proof the shirt you sent me for my bday present fits, thanks mom and dad" vibe. I'm sure we'll find out at trial if that was a pic he sent to them or not and if there was a text he sent along with it.
 
Why the separate counties you think? Based on where these people live?

Yup.

Pullman is in Whitman County. Adams is just to the west of Whitman County. It's about 1h 30m drive from Pullman to Adams County. Could be some undergrad student he was TA for who has since graduated and moved, ditto for someone who was in the PhD program, or even a professor who has retired recently.

I really really doubt that you can sue for defamation when you are awaiting your trial for murdering 4 ppl. And even if you could, it feels like that would be mis-use of your court appt public defender.....you know, the one who is soooooooooo busy trying to look through every piece of evidence herself that she's asking for a continuance.
 
Not to mention, when you search for selfies BK took in years prior--it's clear the boy does NOT know how to adjust his flash setting or account for harsh lighting in the room/outside. Plenty of bad angles, glare, and wash out.

While I like to look for hidden meaning and clues as much as the next person, given the timing of his phone calls to his parents and the time of the photo, paired with the oddity of wearing a white button up dress shirt on a Sunday morning, that photo gives me more of a "here's proof the shirt you sent me for my bday present fits, thanks mom and dad" vibe. I'm sure we'll find out at trial if that was a pic he sent to them or not and if there was a text he sent along with it.
But that's just it. If it was a selfie sent to his parents, to celebrate his ability to dress himself, it's still a photo taken mere hours after slaughtering four young people. Akin to criminals in the Sonic drive-thru for post-murder munchies. It's the contrast that is creepy.

JMO
 
And to show my work, here's screen shots. The name search function gets you the listing of all the filings and their case numbers. Then, choosing the Case search option across the top and putting in the appropriate county and case number) gets you the basic status info.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.37.11 PM.webp
    Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.37.11 PM.webp
    30.3 KB · Views: 16
  • Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.37.39 PM.webp
    Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.37.39 PM.webp
    21.4 KB · Views: 16
  • Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.40.54 PM.webp
    Screen Shot 2025-06-07 at 2.40.54 PM.webp
    28.8 KB · Views: 16
I can't fathom being any too pleased to be summoned to testify on behalf of the defense in this case, because I sat next to the defendant in class.

I imagine most of these people are on AT's witness list to give the appearance she has a point to make.

I imagine few of these people will scissor be called, and if they are, they'll all sound a bit like this:

I worked with/lived near/studied with BK and I found him altogether unremarkable.

You may be excused.

JMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
529
Total visitors
659

Forum statistics

Threads
625,627
Messages
18,507,158
Members
240,826
Latest member
rhannie88
Back
Top