4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered, Bryan Kohberger Arrested, Moscow, Nov 2022 #98

[DizzyB]

Now she is crapping all over DM’s interview and credibility.

 

[Arkay]

I’m up to the Franks part but have to leave—-I know I’ll find out everything here later tonight.

So far I’m exceedingly unimpressed by AT’s argument.

The 4th Amendment:



As I read this, of course as a layperson, I still see the terms “unreasonable” and “upon probable cause.”

In my estimation this search is not unreasonable and there is due probable cause.

Naturally I will leave the fine points to the lawyers.

I grasp that the whole goal here is to exclude the DNA because it’s Bryan’s and the D doesn’t want this evidence in trial.

Slam dunk otherwise—-the DNA is the pulsating red arrow that points directly at BK.

Truly, why fight against the DNA reveal if your client is innocent?

Trash in the driveway or trash near the house, FBI database or whatever, if your client didn’t murder the victims then his DNA would not be on the sheath.

“Sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

IMO

 

[StarryStarryNight]

Next up, making the case for a Frank's hearing...

Are we going to hear AT say that the warrant for the arrest is a lie because of the prior searches she has deemed warrantless?

Where warrants weren't required...

If she's not careful, she's going to spin herself dizzy with her warrant merry-go-around.

JMO

 

[INfisherman]

What she's talking about now is what makes me angry. I'm sorry for joking, now. I don't like AT AT ALL, anymore. IMO

I don’t believe the judge does either. He keeps shifting around anxiously like he wants to hear anything but her voice.

 

[Megnut]

New info... from AT... KG's dog was found in a room with an open door.

Not sure what her point was....

But that poor pup. Obedient. Waiting for permission, no doubt...

JMO

 

[Megnut]

So far, AT has succeeded only in underscoring the undeniable -- it is BK's DNA.

JMO

 

[Megnut]

Boom.

Judge: if the Court allows the IGG, and it had been included in the PCA, wouldn't that have strengthened the probable cause?

is AT going to argue next for the charges to be dropped because no impartial jury can be seated because this hearing for a hearing was streamed, while she and the defendant are drowning?

JMO

 

[INfisherman]

"It matters because it wasn’t an investigation."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

This is better than a Springer “He is NOT the father" montage!

 

[StarryStarryNight]

So far, AT has succeeded only in underscoring the undeniable -- it is BK's DNA.

JMO

I agree.
How can BK have an expectation of privacy unless his DNA is on that sheath at the crime scene.
My, my, my.

 

[SpiderFalcon]

"It matters because it wasn’t an investigation."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

This is better than a Springer “He is NOT the father" montage!

QUIT making me laugh, I'M still mad....

 

[arielilane]

This is a repeat of the good old days with Judge Judge. moo

 

[Megnut]

AT is disputing two minutes time???? In CCTV ....

Now seven minutes....

Am I to believe that an Elantra split into two? One going to Moscow and one headed to... see stars?

I see she's wearing her rollerblades.

When the facts aren't on your side, you:

Ob. Few. Skate.

JMO

 

[QB2022]

The lack of coherency in the argument is making my brain hurt

 

[MassGuy]

The judge, referring to the DNA on the sheath and it's match to the DNA of Bryan Kohberger:

"Isn't that probable cause every day, and twice on Sunday?"

 

[Rolypolyoly]

I don’t believe the judge does either. He keeps shifting around anxiously like he wants to hear anything but her voice.

I don't think I've ever seen a judge look so obviously bored! I'm sure he's rolling his eyes every time he looks to be rubbing them!

 

[AcousticViper]

The car identification argument is desperate stuff. It's true the 1112 camera quality is poor. However, the 1112 footage is valuable as part of a longer sequence of recordings that detail SV1 traversing the neighbourhood. There are no other cars moving in sequence with SV1 to confuse its identification. Once fingered, it was tracked to King Road via other recordings. Unless Anne Taylor thinks the real SV1 took to the sky like Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and was supplanted by and a different vehicle that spawned from the sky, it matters not one iota. The gist of SV1's importance is accurately conveyed in the PCA and AT provides nothing to counter it other than "omission" and "more detail should have been furnished to the magistrate."

 

[arielilane]

I’m up to the Franks part but have to leave—-I know I’ll find out everything here later tonight.

So far I’m exceedingly unimpressed by AT’s argument.

The 4th Amendment:

View attachment 559887

As I read this, of course as a layperson, I still see the terms “unreasonable” and “upon probable cause.”

In my estimation this search is not unreasonable and there is due probable cause.

Naturally I will leave the fine points to the lawyers.

I grasp that the whole goal here is to exclude the DNA because it’s Bryan’s and the D doesn’t want this evidence in trial.

Slam dunk otherwise—-the DNA is the pulsating red arrow that points directly at BK.

Truly, why fight against the DNA reveal if your client is innocent?

Trash in the driveway or trash near the house, FBI database or whatever, if your client didn’t murder the victims then his DNA would not be on the sheath.

“Sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

IMO

There you go again throwing out logic. great post, as usual.

 

[MeadowMuffin]

This is embarrassing.

 

[MassGuy]

Defense claiming that no DNA in the car after it was completely taken apart means that there's no probable cause here. Judge pointing to other evidence, and the possibility that he covered himself in protective clothing and put it in a bag on the way out.

That latter theory is apparently in one of the affidavits. I like that one a lot.

 

[al66pine]

At today's hearing, Judge said (my imperfect paraphrasing):

DNA on knife sheath w direct match to BK's DNA is probable cause, every day and twice on Sunday.