If we get to see or hear much of it AFTER the verdicts, I'll be fine with that.
Just hope it isn't made a difficult process and open to the public not too long after.
If we get to see or hear much of it AFTER the verdicts, I'll be fine with that.
Recently KA had a statement released about her relationship via HER OWN lawyer (pro bono per the statement). I wonder, will that lawyer represent KA on the stand as well?What are they going to put KA on the stand for? If the defense was calling her to the stand I could easily think of reasons why. I'm a bit stumped about why the State is calling her. Anybody have Prosecution case-affiliated reasons?
I could be totally out in left field on this, and rarely if ever hear/heard anything about it, but if I were investigating this crime, I'd be analyzing how many sets of footprints went down that hill, through the woods, to the creek and beyond.
These jury members have my uttermost respect as my phone is like a extra limb for me at this stage.
There is no way in hell I could give up my phone for any length of time.
I don't have great expectations of that happening other than what the reporters have; someone will have to buy the transcripts.If we get to see or hear much of it AFTER the verdicts, I'll be fine with that.
Wouldn't he just bill the State? Why didn't the court have designated spots for staff available I wonder?Wonder if Rozzi will fight his parking ticket to Judge Gull?![]()
So let's say that happened---There is ONE guy, seen in the video, right next to the girls.Passing RA on the bridge isn't necessary imo - IF - a person was ALREADY at the other end of the bridge then possibly RA wouldn't have seen him at all. My theory supposes exactly this - that someone COULD have been on the other end and that person COULD have pretended to pass them on the far end, then doubled back. I'm not saying it DID happen. Is just speculation on my part as to what the D may suggest to create reasonable doubt. mooooooooo
Or... it might be because he actually parked... elsewhere? Mooo... maybe it wasn't his car at the old CPS location?Also in this as well as the affidavit RA is the only one to calls the building Farm Bureau. (Which it wasn't and never has been called Farm Bureau). Everyone else calls it the Child Protection service building.
It's like he couldn't bring himself to say Child Protection Service building.
I have full confidence that when we actually hear the context in court, it will be very very close to what I am referring to. JMOThere is no link in the post you are quoting. The video has nothing to do with RA's confessions.
So, no.. unfortunately we don't hear the actual context.
IMO
He quite literally confessed to killing his family, saying “I killed my family”I have full confidence that when we actually hear the context in court, it will be very very close to what I am referring to. JMO
my feet killed me all day yesterday. As an example.He quite literally confessed to killing his family, saying “I killed my family”
I don’t understand what is subjective about this?
Jmo
They know what the video shows - they may not know if that man was already on the other end of the bridge, or if he followed them entirely across - maybe they have his entire walk across that bridge for all we know... guess we'll know soon.LE has the whole video. They know from which direction the man was approaching.
JMO
I'd be surprised actually if the jurors were permitted IG, whatsapp as those are social media sites... Is there actually any link etc that would tell us one way or the other what the jurors would be permitted to do on devices that are internet connected? MOOO.You would be allowed to use the internet but it has to be while in the group, being supervised by a bailiff. So like after dinner, some jurors could choose to go to a community room, and they could use their tablets or laptops online, but a bailiff would be circling around, glancing at screens.
You wouldn't be allowed to look at CNN, twitter etc, but could check your emails, and IG, What's App etc.
And could probably log into sports or entertainment podcasts etc.
I think it's also possible that he knew he had ejected a round, but forgot about it during the ensuing murders. Kind of like Brian Kohberger and the knife sheath.
Remains to be seen really - I could believe it went down as the state suggests: that RA followed across and ordered them down the hill, but I want them to have the evidence - actual evidence, beyond circumstantial - to prove the point.If he’s been waiting there, lurking for some time… Why? Does he know they’re coming? If so, why not just take them down the hill right away when they arrive?
He goes out onto the bridge. Is he scouting the other side? If so, he sees RA on the first platform. It isn’t safe. And he’s leaving his intended victims unattended. Can he be sure they’re unsuspecting? The constraints on their flight are not physical.
Not buying. I know about other lines of evidence. I can see the outline of RA’s Sig printing through BG’s jacket pocket. I can do Occam’s Razor.
Oh! I just asked for this info and just like that -- scroll a bit further down and here it is! Ty.#Delphi: Juror phones are collected and held by bailiffs and returned to jurors at night to be used under supervision, per Judge Fran Gull. #RichardAllen
Ok the coat ok, she told LE he owned one the same color and make. The car, ok who was driving it that day. Guns, ok. Bullet in described as keepsake box, maybe ok. Do you think they'll ask her whereabouts on Feb 13, 2017? <modsnip: No source to comment> Do you think they'll ask her about the confession phone calls and play them while she's on the stand?My guess would be questions about RA's comings and goings, his owning a blue coat, why he might have a bullet on his dresser, what car he normally drove...lots of reasons.
As always, JMO.
Ohhh I very definitely want to learn more about the bullet and the science that is used to identify it as belonging to this gun or that gun! MOooo.Well your southend approach guy would be reckless to approach from that side without knowing if anyone else ( witnesses) would be directly behind his victims or approaching from the north end of the bridge. He also would need to dress exactly like RA ( who just happened to be on the north side of MHB) and he would need to be short with bunched up jeans and too long sleeves on his windbreaker style jacket and sound like RA and most importantly carry the same model gun as RA and also have one of RA’s bullets to leave at the crime scene.
He also would need to leave the crime scene on a path directly opposite of his entry and instead walk northwest near a traveled road to be seen by the witnesses in his path to RA’s car parked at CPS.
It just doesn’t seem probable IMO
RA approached from the north end after effectively sweeping the trails to make sure there would not be any surprise witness from the north side.
Sounds like perhaps he didn’t count on possible interruptions on the south side.
All my opinion.