- Joined
- Sep 11, 2024
- Messages
- 2,450
- Reaction score
- 29,671
…and probably just the tip of the iceberg if I were to guess. Not an accurate representation of my home town at all.Sums up the behaviour and ethics of this defence team IMO
JMO
…and probably just the tip of the iceberg if I were to guess. Not an accurate representation of my home town at all.Sums up the behaviour and ethics of this defence team IMO
KA would be very very shortsighted to admit that in court. If they cant prove perjury or rather if they cant prove that it is or is not her scarf she can say whatever she wants. I put nothing past anyone.And what about the scarf at the crime scene?
Wouldn't it be something if KA gets on the stand and testifies that is actually hers?
That is totally speculation on my part but I wouldn't be surprised if they have something big like that.
Jurors will remember this...10K of taxpayer dollars shot to heck to learn what we already knew because the D was spraying spaghetti at the wall.
I hope they are learning who the DT is and what to and what not to expect from them. I think the jurors are smart enough to see what DT meant to insinuate about the hair and other things and the fact that they were being deceptive. All those insinuations and misstatements will add up to a lack of trust in anything DT has to say. big fat cow MOOJust imagining the jurors thinking back to the first mention of this in the opening statements and wondering what is on their minds as they hear this info.
Maybe one day technology will progress enough that the miniscule traces will be testable, but yeah..She [Bozinovski] soon turned to the cartridge found at the murder scene. The state’s firearms expert, Melissa Oberg, said she turned the cartridge over for DNA and fingerprint analysis before gathering the ballistics data.
Bozinovski said she attempted to collect skin cells from the cartridge. She also displayed the cartridge to the jury for the first time. She said it was difficult to get DNA from cartridges because of their small size. The DNA found on the cartridge was insufficient for further analysis.
She added that the State Police Crime Lab no longer tested cartridges because of the difficulty in capturing results.
Other attempts to glean DNA from items recovered from the murder scene found most of the material came from one or both of the girls. Some hair found on one of the girls’ shoes was “not consistent with human hair.”
Nothing Bozinovski said during her testimony tied DNA evidence to Allen or any other individual.
Gloves.On Day 9 of testimony, Stacy Bozinovski, an Indiana State Police forensic scientist, took the stand. Bozinovski spent the first part of testimony outlining her qualifications and giving the jury a crash court in DNA collection and analysis.
Bozinovski worked on DNA evidence in the Delphi case and did the report in March 2017. It included an analysis of the rape kits administered on both girls.
Bozinovski said the kits were tested and no semen was detected. Other swabs detected the possible presence of male DNA. The amount was insufficient, however, and Bozinovski didn’t do a confirmatory test because she wanted to make the most of the sample.
No male DNA was present on vaginal cervical swaps, she told the court. She did find male DNA in genital swaps and fingernails but said that was not necessarily an unusual result. It could have come from shared clothing and yielded very little DNA.
There was no DNA evidence showing the girls were sexually assaulted.
Bozinovski said hair found in Abby Williams’ hand—a key point the defense brought up in opening statements—appeared to be from one of Libby German’s family members. Testing performed in 2024—just earlier this month—showed the hair came from Kelsi German Siebert, Libby’s sister.
It was a 1 in 8 trillion match, Bozinovski told the court.
Source: https://fox59.com/delphi-trial/delphi-murders-states-dna-expert-takes-the-stand/
I hope they are learning who the DT is and what to and what not to expect from them. I think the jurors are smart enough to see what DT meant to insinuate about the hair and other things and the fact that they were being deceptive. All those insinuations and misstatements will add up to a lack of trust in anything DT has to say. big fat cow MOO
I wonder if we'll hear more about that. From a different analyst."Some hair found on one of the girls’ shoes was “not consistent with human hair.”
KA would be very very shortsighted to admit that in court. If they cant prove perjury or rather if they cant prove that it is or is not her scarf she can say whatever she wants. I put nothing past anyone.
And what about the scarf at the crime scene?
Wouldn't it be something if KA gets on the stand and testifies that is actually hers?
That is totally speculation on my part but I wouldn't be surprised if they have something big like that.
I know...For God’s sake don’t let any LEO near it. They evidently have issues with pushing the right buttons.
ETA forgot to quote, clarity
If you look at that still of BG he has his hands in his pockets, but you can see just a little bit of light area from his sleeve to his pockets. Is this his wrists?Gloves.
Gloves explain that.
JMO