I'm ignoring the podcast and social media folks during this trial.TMS reported testimony to indicate the some of the background noise was removed. Does everything have to insinuate a nefarious manipulation of evidence?
They also said it was played twice the first time and perhaps someone remembers better than me but another time again the next day?
100%. I believe that indeed there was tunnel vision in this case. Just not in the direction of RA; in fact having followed the case, there was tunnel vision from SOME LE towards every suspect but RA.They LE should have found RA by 2019 at the latest, when they started again with people, they had already interrogated in 2017. They knew, the suspect was someone, who had tried to involve himself into the investigation. Why didn't this realization help to find this person? Were there so many men, who had tried to involve themselves?? Would perhaps be interesting to know these men, but of course we won't ever learn of them. MOO
I suppose it would be helpful to know what tools were used to make the two videos so glaringly different.
As has been reported.
I think, if another man had been waiting for the girls at the end of the bridge (South) and had said "DTH", Libby wouldn't have dared to film BG/RA as she did. IMO
I think rez is referring to the video techs editing the video in second viewing?Tools? An audio file and a computer would only be required. Once the sound waves of the rustling noise is identified, it’s removed resulting in the voices to be better heard. The D would’ve no doubt hired their own audio technician to ensure the file was properly cleaned up properly. JMO
BBMThanks for taking the time to share those collated pictures.
However I just can't reconcile that with Andrea Burkhart's description of the video (I'll find the timestamped portion of her video report and signpost it here) and she has obviously seen the video as played in court.
Paraphrasing, Andrea struggled to see the image of BG in the distance, and then correspond this with the audio - asking how BG would have gotten close enough in the time period to be captured apparently ordering the girls 'down the hill'.
I suppose it could make sense if BG and the person whose voice we hear saying DTH are two different people but the state's theory of the crime is that there is only one perpetrator of the kidnap and murder.
From MS, they said they could barely see RA the first time around because of how bad the video was moving. One of them did see RA the first time around, but AC was too bamboozled to see much. When they showed the 'upright version' they said it was terrifying because of how close he appeared to be behind Abby.<modsnip - quoted post was snipped>
I've only heard they're (girls) near the end of it and that you can barely see BG. Then seconds later the "Down the hill" audio comes in.
My thoughts exactly. Pot stirrers. Does nothing to honor the memory of those 2 girls.I'm ignoring the podcast and social media folks during this trial.
The trial has been difficult enough to follow.
100%. I believe that indeed there was tunnel vision in this case. Just not in the direction of RA; in fact having followed the case, there was tunnel vision from SOME LE towards every suspect but RA.
If I had to rage about one thing in this case, it would be how doggedly they pursued leads that frankly only looked good on paper, and the statements DC made in press conference. I understand why he got so emotional and invested, but once you share your personal, unsubstantiated theories with the public, it is hard to unring that bell.
All MOO
We're not privy to the video so all I can do is report from somebody who has seen it, and maybe has a better appreciation of the distances etc.BBM
BG quickly walked.
KA’s video showed RA as very limber, quick movements, compact; moves like Jagger KA says.
Would have taken seconds for the little pervert to scoot so eagerly right up to the girls.
There’s been opinions posted for years on WS that BG bearing down on them so quickly and intently was what scared the girls.
all imo
….or enhance and improve satanic and/or subliminal messages for conspiracy theorists. (Kidding)This is much the same process used to remaster music from decades ago. JMO
Because IMO the jurors will have access to the actual autopsy report that is timestamped. Unfortunately as is the access atm, the trial is mostly for the jurors benefit and not ours, so I can only hope that the TOD maths (which make sense if the autopsy was done at 8am on the 15th) are explained to the jury. We can wait until the transcripts are released...Yes I'm aware it's an estimation but found it odd he testified it was 41 hours prior to autopsy, why did he state it that way and not give his estimated time.
Why didn't he just state what time he carried out the autopsies in addition to the 41 hours?
Because IMO the jurors will have access to the actual autopsy report that is timestamped. Unfortunately as is the access atm, the trial is mostly for the jurors benefit and not ours, so I can only hope that the TOD maths (which make sense if the autopsy was done at 8am on the 15th) are explained to the jury. We can wait until the transcripts are released...
All MOO
Hello friend,We're not privy to the video so all I can do is report from somebody who has seen it, and maybe has a better appreciation of the distances etc.
FWIW Lee Wallace is a trial lawyer with 31 years of experience that spans 20 different states. She has worked both defense side and plaintiffs side. She is still practicing today.Different people are going to have different opinions on what the evidence shows that is why I am only looking at the MSM coverage of this. No youtubers. It is difficult to tell what is their opinion and what was actually shown because we don't have audio to hear ourselves. Even court transcripts leave out a lot of nuance that can be interpreted in different ways by different people.
100%. Having a single YTer (who EDITS their videos with that same software, and in theory, is able to click on 'stabilise' and 'remove noise' and test out how magically it changes videos) clutch their pearls that such magic technology exists leaves me wondering why they'd feign that kind of shock.Enhanced in my mind means background noise scrubbing software was used.
I used a basic version many years ago when I was cleaning up a church presentation that had some narration that had background noise.
This is very basic nowadays... like noise cancelling headphones.
My thoughts exactly. Pot stirrers. Does nothing to honor the memory of those 2 girls.
ETA MOO