Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #208

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
  • #122
Yes. Me, too. I wonder what triggered him so badly. Was it because he changed his timeline?
[snips]
B.W., a Carroll County resident who lives near the trail, testified that he clocked out of work at 2:01 p.m. Feb. 13, 2017 and drove about 20 to 25 minutes to his house. The girls, according to the prosecution's timeline, made it to the high bridge around 2 p.m. and disappeared shortly after.

The defense asked Weber on cross-examination if he'd stopped anywhere, as he'd previously told police. Weber, who appeared in court in overalls and disheveled hair, responded with a shout.

"No!"

His testimony ended there.

Mmm if only they had phone records of BW, and if only he'd appeared in the cell tower dumps.

(IMO, they do, lets see.)
 
  • #123
Was anyone else surprised by BW reaction to being asked about if he had made any stops by the D? Just felt like it jumped very quickly to a defensive. I am NOT implicating him, but did sort of wonder why he jumped so fast when I read the notes from yesterday.
jmo

Some people are just very defensive and don't like to be questioned. Like my wife... LOL
 
  • #124
Today is going to be a huge day. I wish we could hear the audio along with the jury!
 
  • #125
Mmm if only they had phone records of BW, and if only he'd appeared in the cell tower dumps.

(IMO, they do, lets see.)
If the defense goes after BW hard, the jury is going to be turned off, imo. That tactic will make the defense look desperate and mean.

jmopinion
 
  • #126
Is there any link you can provide that tells us what info he got from Dr W? She claims in her testimony she only ever told him that 'people support you' and 'don't talk about the case with anyone but your lawyers'. Has anyone reported otherwise?

As far as I can tell, that information wasn’t detailed - only that she talked to RA about what she had seen on the internet.
 
  • #127
Mmm if only they had phone records of BW, and if only he'd appeared in the cell tower dumps.

(IMO, they do, lets see.)
I wonder about that subpoena that Baldwin served him.
 
  • #128
As far as I can tell, that information wasn’t detailed - only that she talked to RA about what she had seen on the internet.
And much of what RA confessed to was unknown to "the internet."

jmo
 
  • #129
Yes. Me, too. I wonder what triggered him so badly. Was it because he changed his timeline?
[snips]
B.W., a Carroll County resident who lives near the trail, testified that he clocked out of work at 2:01 p.m. Feb. 13, 2017 and drove about 20 to 25 minutes to his house. The girls, according to the prosecution's timeline, made it to the high bridge around 2 p.m. and disappeared shortly after.

The defense asked Weber on cross-examination if he'd stopped anywhere, as he'd previously told police. Weber, who appeared in court in overalls and disheveled hair, responded with a shout.

"No!"

His testimony ended there.


Can’t find it now but Weber first told LE he dropped off a trailer after leaving work, then changed it to going straight home.

Iirc. Jmo
 
  • #130
As far as I can tell, that information wasn’t detailed - only that she talked to RA about what she had seen on the internet.

I've followed this case since it happened... and I have never heard and fact or even rumor that a van or any vehicle came down that gravel road at the time. So, there is VERY LITTLE CHANCE she saw it on the internet and then told RA about it.

The only way this could have come to RA was thru discovery and/or his lawyers.
 
  • #131
Can’t find it now but Weber first told LE he dropped off a trailer after leaving work, then changed it to going straight home.

Iirc. Jmo

Doesn't matter if he had his phone on. And BW doesn't know EXACTLY what time it was, still doesn't matter because he did not see anyone.
 
  • #132
As far as I can tell, that information wasn’t detailed - only that she talked to RA about what she had seen on the internet.
I listen Hidden True crime because she made many notes and the question to Dr. Wala was "you talked with RA about the things that you saw in the internet about the case?" and she says yes. Then the next question was "what do you tell him about that you saw in the internet about case"? and she says she told to him that he have supporters.
 
  • #133
Can’t find it now but Weber first told LE he dropped off a trailer after leaving work, then changed it to going straight home.

Iirc. Jmo
Why would he have done that? I guess it must be really important for it to be so contentious.
 
  • #134
I wonder about that subpoena that Baldwin served him.

I gotta tell you if I were Weber I’d be PO’ed as well. His property was searched early on, nothing found, then drug in to testify and now being subpoenaed to come back, yeah I’d PO’d.

Some folks just don’t want to be bothered.
 
  • #135
As far as I can tell, that information wasn’t detailed - only that she talked to RA about what she had seen on the internet.
I wish the DT had asked for details during counter. Lets see what they have to ask during their turn.
 
  • #136
I've followed this case since it happened... and I have never heard and fact or even rumor that a van or any vehicle came down that gravel road at the time. So, there is VERY LITTLE CHANCE she saw it on the internet and then told RA about it.

The only way this could have come to RA was thru discovery and/or his lawyers.
I agree with you about that.
 
  • #137
I listen Hidden True crime because she made many notes and the question to Dr. Wala was "you talked with RA about the things that you saw in the internet about the case?" and she says yes. Then the next question was "what do you tell him about that you saw in the internet about case"? and she says she told to him that he have supporters.
Same thing Dr W testified to in the pre-trial hearing then, no inconsistency, IMO. Thank you, I didn't have time to watch the whole HTC episode today.
 
  • #138
Upon cross-examination, things got heated between Weber and defense attorney Andrew Baldwin:
Baldwin: "You didn’t drive straight home from work on Feb. 13."
Weber: "That’s not correct."
Baldwin: "You told law enforcement on Feb. 17 or Feb. 18 you went and worked on your ATM machines."
Weber: "I said I dropped off a trailer."
Baldwin: "That was earlier in the day. You went and worked on your ATM machines."
Weber: "(Starts yelling) That’s not correct! No!"
Baldwin then handed Weber a subpoena and Weber stormed out.

 
  • #139
It's a very big request to ask SA victims to do that if it's not completely necessary. We'll find out, I guess.

jmo
100% agreed. Not to mention the statistics. Only 12% of child SA is reported to LE. https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default...packet_statistics-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf
I wouldn't be surprised if any victims of SA in RA's family, if they exist, refuse to come forward even now. It is a great ask, and I don't believe it is needed for BARD.

All MOO

Edited for clarity.
 
  • #140
Upon cross-examination, things got heated between Weber and defense attorney Andrew Baldwin:
Baldwin: "You didn’t drive straight home from work on Feb. 13."
Weber: "That’s not correct."
Baldwin: "You told law enforcement on Feb. 17 or Feb. 18 you went and worked on your ATM machines."
Weber: "I said I dropped off a trailer."
Baldwin: "That was earlier in the day. You went and worked on your ATM machines."
Weber: "(Starts yelling) That’s not correct! No!"
Baldwin then handed Weber a subpoena and Weber stormed out.

The Odinists placed runes over their sacrifices!
The doctor leaked info to him!
The neighbor checked ATMs!
The catfisher was in a car nearby!
Sweep, sweep....just clearing that clutter that out of the way.

jmo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
2,478
Total visitors
2,604

Forum statistics

Threads
633,165
Messages
18,636,744
Members
243,426
Latest member
garachacha
Back
Top