CANADA Canada - Jack, 4 & Lilly Sullivan, 6, Vulnerable, wandered from home 10am, Gairloch Rd, Landsdowne Station, Pictou County, NS, 2 May 2025 #7

[su5ie]

Is this the bit about Daniel's drug use?

No it is insinuating imo that he is alluding to possibly others close to the investigation had a hand in the children's disappearance.

As per my above post , I think he is playing poker in other words if he had that good of a hand ,there would have been arrests . So imo he is bluffing

 

[Bigditch]

No it is insinuating imo that he is alluding to possibly others close to the investigation had a hand in the children's disappearance.

As per my above post , I think he is playing poker in other words if he had that good of a hand ,there would have been arrests . So imo he is bluffing.

Do you know where the part is about him admitting to using meth? I was away and likely missed it.

 

[Megnut]

Is it TRUE that only the stepfather saw Lilly pop into the bedroom a few times that morning? Then is it also true their mother would have last seen her the night before?

On whose observation did she call then into school sick? Do we know she for sure did? Or just her phone? Do we know of there really was a cough?

If the stepfather can't remember much from the night before (when did they go to bed, who slept where, were there baths, bedtime routines, diaper changes, pull ups, etc), why can't be remember? Seems like those events are the ones that imprint. The last things someone said or did, the last interactions.

Details are missing.

Bedtime snacks? Breakfast?

We aren't privy to what their mom has shared with LE, what HER last interactions were.

Granted the biological child was a mere baby, it's still suspicious that the two missing children were stepchildren.

Worth noting, if there was a potential for money to come in (child support from their biological father and/poor government bonus money), it doesn't seem likely that the stepfather would cut off the line of cash flow.

Which leads me to believe, whatever happened to Lilly and Jack, it wasn't planned.

I don't think they had breakfast. Little sentence, says a lot.

JMO

 

[Bekind89]

I mean, at this point, maybe he should? If he's got something to say, has zero involvement in those kids going missing, he certainly doesn't have much to lose at this point.

Exactly. That is a very confusing statement to me. Why on earth would you hold back any information on two missing children?

 

[su5ie]

As time goes on and despite the difficulties the searchers face in the terrain . I find it harder and harder to put faith in this being a case of lost children whom wandered out of the searchers scope .

Re reading over old and the latest msm articles and there are aspects that make an avid reader of crime and missing person cases spot things that seem to scream there is more than meets the eye within the information available
This statement pops out from the reems of pages " we have no reason to believe the kids are dead " this statement in its self defies logic when considering how long the kids are missing.

other statements that if seen in other cases would point to criminality is cps involvement, financial difficulties and black eyes , no scent beyond the yard and the coming and going of a vehicle or vehicles during the night and a family breakdown the day after the kids go missing and the golden nuggets that are drug abuses and DV

I want to believe that this family are the victims of a series of unfortunate events that accumulated over time and their final misfortune was lilly and jack walking into the woods never to be seen again .

Am I niave to trust or am I being led up the garden path

My heart wants to see the best in people and my brain tells me time will tell and logic screams coincidence is a fairytale seen in Hollywood movies .

There is no denying that red flags exist in this case but are they the cause or the effect ?

 

[Bigditch]

As time goes on and despite the difficulties the searchers face in the terrain . I find it harder and harder to put faith in this being a case of lost children whom wandered out of the searchers scope .

Re reading over old and the latest msm articles and there are aspects that make an avid reader of crime and missing person cases spot things that seem to scream there is more than meets the eye within the information available
This statement pops out from the reems of pages " we have no reason to believe the kids are dead " this statement in its self defies logic when considering how long the kids are missing.

other statements that if seen in other cases would point to criminality is cps involvement, financial difficulties and black eyes , no scent beyond the yard and the coming and going of a vehicle or vehicles during the night and a family breakdown the day after the kids go missing and the golden nuggets that are drug abuses and DV

I want to believe that this family are the victims of a series of unfortunate events that accumulated over time and their final misfortune was lilly and jack walking into the woods never to be seen again .

Am I niave to trust or am I being led up the garden path

My heart wants to see the best in people and my brain tells me time will tell and logic screams coincidence is a fairytale seen in Hollywood movies .

There is no denying that red flags exist in this case but are they the cause or the effect ?

Well said Su5ie.
It would appear as if something has gone afoul in Pictou County.

 

[LadyL]

Is this the bit about Daniel's drug use?

no idea

 

[MistyWaters]

BBM

820 tips received in the 5 months since Sullivan children were reported missing

It’s been exactly five months since two Nova Scotia children went missing.

www.ctvnews.ca

“This remains a highly active and intensive missing persons investigation,” said an RCMP spokesperson Thursday in an email to CTV News Atlantic.

Last month, the RCMP announced cadaver dogs would begin searching for the two children.

As of Thursday, the spokesperson said police anticipate providing an update on the work of human remains detection dogs next week.

 

[BCSleuth]

Is it TRUE that only the stepfather saw Lilly pop into the bedroom a few times that morning? Then is it also true their mother would have last seen her the night before?

[...]

I would like the answer to this question also. Everything seems so vague it is frustrating... did the mother see and/or hear the kids that morning or not? Is the Grandmother sure she heard them playing that morning or does she think so? It would go a long way to removing any suspicious from the stepfather if we knew for sure that other family members saw and/or heard the kids that morning.

 

[BCSleuth]

As time goes on and despite the difficulties the searchers face in the terrain . I find it harder and harder to put faith in this being a case of lost children whom wandered out of the searchers scope .

[...] .

Look at the case of Lily Coursol. The 6 year old girl was seen going into the woods. A large search was launched quite quickly. Yet it took them 24 hours to find the girl just 700m from where she went in. And that was largely because she decided to stop moving and wait to be rescued.

While yes, it is hard to believe, it is still possible.

What I would like to know is if the police are confident no potential suspect vehicles drove by at the time the kids went missing. Based on their video collection. All it would take is for them to have gone out to the road and just the wrong person drove by.

One thing is that kids sometimes decide to have an adventure. They could have decided to go to school. They could have decided to go to some landmark in the woods.

One strange thing: if the kids were playing the yard, as the Grandmother claims to have heard, why would they bring their backpack? They wouldn't. So if they decided to leave did they go back in for the backpack? Seems strange to me.