- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 19,736
- Reaction score
- 152,401
Have we seen non redacted polygraph reports or only what has been reported by msm? I might have missed the actual report and not just the impression of it
No, I don't recall ever seeing the actual report posted. But it's also possible I've missed it.
"According to the court records cited by CTV, Brooks-Murray and Martell were first given polygraphs on May 12. The couple were then given subsequent polygraph tests three more times during the investigation. In each session, Brooks-Murray's and Martell's results indicated they were telling the truth, according to the report. Additionally, the children's biological father, Cody Sullivan, was given a polygraph on June 12 and his answers were "truthful," the documents said."

Lilly and Jack Sullivan update: Polygraph test results revealed
The siblings have been missing since the beginning of May.

Kind of wild but there were 8 different polygraphs done just with MBM and DM. And according to court records, both of them were telling the truth every time. To me, that says a lot.
This from the same article explains why so many tests were done:
"An unidentified investigator wrote in the court documents, cited by CTV News: "At this point in the investigation, Jack and Lilly's disappearance is not believed to be criminal in nature. I do not have reasonable grounds to believe a criminal offence has occurred. Because Jack and Lilly are still missing, polygraph examinations were conducted with the intention of ruling out that possibility."