Wondering what this means?
Aug 2025 rbbm
''The documents also show Janie MacKenzie, Martell's mother, did a polygraph test on June 10. Her "physiology" was "not suitable for analysis" and no opinion was rendered.''
Janie reminds me of a hummingbird
Wondering what this means?
Aug 2025 rbbm
''The documents also show Janie MacKenzie, Martell's mother, did a polygraph test on June 10. Her "physiology" was "not suitable for analysis" and no opinion was rendered.''
Unfortunately the women living at the property have two factors that make it hard to decide if they told the truth .
One is DMs mother and the kids are not her bio grandchildren, which of those persons interests may she have possibly had at heart ? Or is it the Mandela effect in action ?
Second woman living at property is allegedly an abused person ,a person we can speculate was living in fear if allegations are true . Statistics will tell us abused persons are often afraid to speak up and are terrified of their abuser .even after the abuser no longer has control . So can we speculate she may not have gave a true version of events that morning either ,out of reflexive self protection mode
Murder is committed not by genius but firstly by anger ,sometimes also greed and secondly by determination to get away with it imo.
So if things were coming to a head - DV possibly escalating, kids getting noticed by teachers, kids possibly getting interviewed by social services and things seemed to be coming to the surface.
Seems like DM thought the way to solve the problem was perhaps getting rid of the kids to not be exposed.
He does seems like a narcissist. One thing a narcissist hates is being exposed. Their reputation is huge for them and how others see them (except the people they live with who see their true, ugly side).
The only thing that still nags me is - I still can't see how he could pull this off for so long! He's not smart. Maybe dumb luck? Or he had help. Seems like DM is guilty but something is still nagging at me that doesn't fit!! Not sure why...
I agree, that's the ONE thing that doesn't align or make sense (to me). How could he not leave SOMETHING for LE to grasp onto?
Maybe LE have more than we know but I still can't shake that DM could pull this off, he seems like a f*ck up in life, but can get away with murder? Unless he had help from someone smarter than him - but then it would be very pre-meditated.
To get away with murder, someone doesn't have to be a genius who planned and executed it perfectly. They just have to be lucky.Committing homicide without leaving a trace of evidence requires a high level of intelligence and planning. The majority of homicides in Canada are solved within 100 days. I don't believe that DM has the intellectual ability to commit a double homicide without leaving a trail of evidence.
Homicide in Canada, 2021
This annual Juristat article presents 2021 homicide data. Short and long-term trends in homicide are examined at the national, provincial/territorial and census metropolitan area levels. Gang-related homicides, firearm-related homicides, intimate partner homicides, and homicides committed by...www150.statcan.gc.ca
I wouldn't go as far to say that it 'doesn't mean anything' in regards to Lily and Jack.This doesn’t really mean anything imo regarding Lily and Jack. The people involved have never come off as productive well meaning citizens so criminal activity isn’t really that surprising to me. DM is abut could also be innocent regarding L&J. Two things can be true.
I agree with the above sentiments.I think it is a fallacy to believe only highly intelligent people can plan or get away with murder, or that only dumb people get caught. I’d say Douglas Garland was highly intelligent yet he was caught. Robert Pickton - not a high IQ but got away with many murders for a long time before he was caught.
Was Bruce MacArthur smart because he got away with it for years, or dumb because he was eventually caught?
I think, if we look at many murders, we would see a mix of both smart and dumb folks caught for their crime.
In this case, how smart would someone need to be, hypothetically, to strangle a child and dispose of their body in a large barely inhabited forest area where they’ve lived all their life, while owning an all terrain vehicle? How much incriminating evidence might by left behind?
IMO
I don't think MBM felt she could dare to say that he was abusive towards her kids because she could permanently lose custody of the baby if she never reported him for abusing her children and only left after they went missing. I'd think she was neglectful if I was a social worker deciding if she should have custody of her baby.I dare say I'm looking forward to possibly learning if the charges against DM are for the adult female on Gairloch Rd in Landsdowne on December 1, 2024 who is in fact MBM.
If he did this and is found guilty, it seems pretty likely, IMO, he assaulted, sexually assaulted, and forcibly confined MBM, which aligns with what she publicly said he had done to her in the past (but without mentioning the SA).
I think there must be some proof of him committing these crimes against that adult female on that day on that road for LE to arrest him and charge him.
Which makes me wonder if there is some recorded proof of some sort or if testimony of the victim alone or corroborated by others is sufficient for an arrest and leveling charges against him.
There aren't that many residential properties on Gairloch Road for it to be likely that it could be another adult female.
But I guess he could have committed these crimes against a neighbor or at a party or gathering at their property or in the neighborhood.
Also just noting that December 1 was a Sunday.
Not sure what else to say other than I hope these charges are the beginning of the end of DM acting all innocent in terms of whether he treated his family well or not and acting like he was the only one keeping things together at home, IMO.
MBM replying when asked by media if he ever physically abused missing Lilly and Jack that in her opinion/to her knowledge he didn't physically abuse them but "he had a voice they listened to" notwithstanding.
JMO