- Joined
- Apr 7, 2014
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 8,221
I agree with both of your posts. IMO I feel like it is a stretch to charge LM with terrorism. IMO any “stranger on stranger” assault and/or murder, unless done during the commission of another crime (i.e. a robbery) could be considered terrorism if defined broadly, as I feel they are trying to do here in LM’s case.I hear what you're saying but the terrorism element is a very specific thing they need to prove.
Don't get me wrong because, yes, in all probability I'm sure he sees himself as some sort of savior/deity type chasing some narcissistic dream ending with him being covered in glory by changing the system but it's a difficult thing to prove.
If his defence takes the tack that ...yes, he hates all the corporate greed and corruption but accepts that he'll never change anything and wasn't setting out to but, rather, just decided to give these people what he felt they deserved... then does that meet the very specific criteria in the legislation? On the face of it, no, I don't think it does.
IIRC, someone in an earlier post here mentioned this as well, saying that it could then be considered “terrorism” if a man assaults a random woman that is a stranger to him as these types of attacks can cause “terror” in a specific population (women). This could be considered especially true when looking at serial rapists and/or killers. Yet have we ever seen one of these types of defendants ever charged with terrorism?