- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 29,780
- Reaction score
- 206,357
Why do they need DNA from the hostel? I don't think they do. They have evidence he stayed there without the DNA, and they have his DNA from other items. What am I missing?The problem (legally) with that room is that it probably contains DNA from lots of people - many of them male.
The jumbled nature of the DNA in a hostel will allow the defense (this guy is thinking ahead) to claim that it could have been any one of another people staying there at about that time. Hostel records are important, but the prosecutors would be in the weird position of trying to show that it was recent guests' DNA along with perp DNA (which, btw, no one has so far, so isn't going to lead us).
These sound like stalling tactics, but they are definitely going to slow things down. Let's say there are 20 partial male profiles in that hostel room (not at all a crazy estimate - could be way more).
The FBI has to run all of them. It's not like the Idaho Four crime scene, where there were only a few profiles (as far as we know - only one that was at the actual crime scene). The JonBenet case offers us some Asian dna and maybe one stranger profile. The Suzanne Morphew case offers us stranger DNA in the glove compartment of her vehicle.
These things confound investigations, but they also allow for defenses not otherwise possible.
I really think this perp is playing off all of that.
And to avoid extra posts: Hilfinger jackets are not super expensive. (Not directed at you, MassGuy).
IMO.
jmo