I see no problem at all with someone NOT admiring/supporting LM, while still having the same complaints about the healthcare insurance industry that he does.See for me the whole thing about admire and support LM’s cause but don’t condone his murder of BT is a real slippery slope because if you admire and support his cause, to me it follows that you are condoning his murdering BT.
Maybe I’m missing something and honestly my brain is a little fried at this point but do his supporters mean something akin to they don’t condone what he did but admire and support him because he did the dirty work for them/on their behalf? or what exactly?
TIA
IMHOO
ETA-clarity
There are a LOT of people who think the same things about the industry as LM claims to think. But there are (hopefully) VERY few people who think that the solution to the problem is to kill the CEO!
So railing against the healthcare insurance industry and even the individual execs can easily go hand in hand with condemning the criminal actions of LM. No problem at all in my mind with someone saying both of those things simultaneously.
But it seems some people are somehow confused and think their hatred of the industry means support of murder by LM. How that's happening I don't understand, but yes, it might be partly due to LM being such an admirable guy in many ways except for his one fatal flaw.