Plus I was waiting to see if the State would dispute the defense statement in their reply motion that there is no connection between BK and the victims and no explanation for the lack of victim DNA in his car, home, etc. They did not dispute it.
That's very telling. Just imagine how much risk the defense took if they lied about all these. How foolish, and unprofessional they would look if the state exposed them. The defense wouldn't take such risk, they know what they were doing, and what they could expect from the state.
That's very telling. Just imagine how much risk the defense took if they lied about all these. How foolish, and unprofessional they would look if the state exposed them. The defense wouldn't take such risk, they know what they were doing, and what they could expect from the state.
The Defense says there was no victim DNA evidence found in his car, office, apartment or his parents house. There was "precious little" evidence found at all. All of this is according to Ann Taylor who has seen the actual discovery and wrote this in a court filing. Defense attorneys are not permitted to lie in court filings or anything they do or say in court as they could be fined, jailed or disbarred or all of those things. It is against the law in Idaho for the Prosecution or Defense to keep secret evidence.