- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 578
- Reaction score
- 7,924
I don’t comment much but I was here on the day the girls were first missing and I’m here today. May the truth be heard.
What I’m saying is, to the best of my knowledge based on the information we have so far, none of the witnesses who said they saw a man at the trails that day have said it was Richard Allen, after his arrest.BBM
I didn’t forget. I just don’t see it as relevant.
I find it offensive that the community is being insulted for their innocence and naivety when it comes to blaming their fellow residents.
Richard Allen was an invisible little nobody. No reports of his being a community leader, neighborhood watch, municipality community committee member, no clubs, just some pool playing at the pub.
RA didn’t have any visibility in the community to come to anyone attention, imo.
I wouldn’t recognize or even contemplate my pharmacy workers as I would be thinking I was looking for a monster; someone I could identify as such at a glance. Not the invisible enemy lurking at my store.
And no one apparently has recognized BG as anyone else most notably also not the men whose names were drug through the mud by the wrongly accusing sm consumers.
All imo
BBMWhat I’m saying is, to the best of my knowledge based on the information we have so far, none of the witnesses who said they saw a man at the trails that day have said it was Richard Allen, after his arrest.
I’m not saying they should have recognized him in the community. Just that they have not recognized him as being the man they saw that day.
Again, that’s based on the information we have so far. But we know the witnesses for a fact that they witnesses who helped create the sketches can’t identify him.
No cameras, no phones in the courtroom.... so no live tweets either? Is the public (aka us) only privy to updates from media at breaks and the end of the day then?
I think you linked me to the wrong one. That one interviews BM and another defense atty with no discussion about a falsified affidavit.
What I’m saying is, to the best of my knowledge based on the information we have so far, none of the witnesses who said they saw a man at the trails that day have said it was Richard Allen, after his arrest.
I’m not saying they should have recognized him in the community. Just that they have not recognized him as being the man they saw that day.
Again, that’s based on the information we have so far. But we know the witnesses for a fact that they witnesses who helped create the sketches can’t identify him.
The new stuff Lawyer Lee talked about? No I don't know exactly what is was all about, just what she said, falsifying an affidavit.
I could do books, knit, or crochet. Wonder if I could take my tablet for endless e-books? Being away from all family would be the hard part. MOO.Does anyone read books anymore? Jurors could bring their own book to read and the state would not need to provide any entertainment. But maybe that's too old school.
I want to hear RA speak his truth...but I think we'll only get to read it? If his audio/video and letters get admitted to evidence does the media get a copy?
I am too. I can not believe this! If this is allowed, it seems to be grounds for a mistrial, before the trial even begins, IMO!
Some clarity on where the ribbons honoring Abby and Libby are located. They don’t seem to be on the courthouse…just on street lamps surrounding the area.
What I’m saying is, to the best of my knowledge based on the information we have so far, none of the witnesses who said they saw a man at the trails that day have said it was Richard Allen, after his arrest.
I’m not saying they should have recognized him in the community. Just that they have not recognized him as being the man they saw that day.
Again, that’s based on the information we have so far. But we know the witnesses for a fact that they witnesses who helped create the sketches can’t identify him.
That’s one beautiful court room compared to most. IMO