CANADA Canada - Jack, 4 & Lilly Sullivan, 6, Vulnerable, wandered from home 10am, Gairloch Rd, Landsdowne Station, Pictou County, NS, 2 May 2025 #7

[musicaljoke]

<modsnip: Quoted post was removed> ... the searching in water right from the first moment they realized they were missing, this does not ring true for me. Myself, I wouldn’t panic with the first thought “drowned in water!” Rather I would go to different areas where they might go, calling their names. Then I’d go a bit further. When I started to feel really worried, I might wonder about water.
IMHO

I'd go to the water first because that's where the greatest risk would be.

 

[Slebby]

I’ve been following another missing persons case, that of 14 year old Samuel Bird, missing from Edmonton since June 1, and presumed murdered.
Samuel’s remains were found yesterday west of Edmonton by LE in an a search area they had identified through their investigation.
I’ve just finished watching the press conference related to that case from earlier today. Something that stood out to me, spoken once by the police chief and again by the lead detective - “not all police work is done in the public eye”

I believe this to be the case here, in the case of Jack and Lilly. LE does not owe the public a full accounting of all the facts of the case. Yet they are often criticized by an impatient public, hoping for full disclosure and quick resolution.
Seeing one case solved has given me new confidence in LE to solve the mystery of the disappearance of Jack and Lilly.
IMHO

 

[abanddb123]

U guys are gonna think I'm ridiculous, but I just watched a live feed of klieninvestations, it was about deorr kunz. Anyway, different case, but I just learned so much of science, courts, and laws that go on behind these scenes of investigations. It was really interesting! One thing this investigator says, is time is on their side. And if u watch it, it makes sense. We just have to be patient on this case. I really do think there is so much going on and they have to do it right the first time. Just my 2 cents.

 

[Ursa Major]

DM says he turned on the light at midnight to check on kids. Could it be said to get ahead in case someone saw the light on at midnight? Just a thought.

 

[Firstsnow4]

New article from CBC

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lilly-jack-sullivan-missing-children-court-documents-car-vehicle-9.6943179

Am I reading this right - “[Justin Smith] later spoke with Brad Wong who informed him Daniel's vehicle came and went five or six times that night. Wong said the car Smith heard was Daniel.”

The other neighbour Brad said “the vehicle would drive off in the distance and he could hear it stop and then return. He said it remained in earshot the entire time.”

So a neighbour is saying it was Daniel’s car that came and went 5 or 6 times that night? And wherever it went it wasn’t far. And Maleya didn’t know what time Daniel came to bed or what he was doing that night?

And all this happened the night before the kids disappeared?!

Smells fishy to me. JMO.

 

[Absoluterubbish]

DM says he turned on the light at midnight to check on kids. Could it be said to get ahead in case someone saw the light on at midnight? Just a thought.

You don’t turn a children’s room
Light on to check on them IMO. Why would you do that

 

[twomoresmores]

I may be wrong and may have missed bits but DM and MBM reported to LE that they thought the children had been abducted? And DM has maintained that to this day? Yet his first response was to go through the woods and pools of water looking for them. So is he saying as a result of not finding them in his initial search, they therefore must have been taken? Or did he always feel they'd been abducted but perhaps had been taken into the woods? Hence looking there first. Yet part of Lily's blanket was found in the woods. Is this discrepancy more of things just not adding up?

 

[Hexe]

You don’t turn a children’s room
Light on to check on them IMO. Why would you do that

Depends on how strong is the light and how sensitive the children are to it.

 

[TMich6811]

1 person hearing a car is coincidence, 2 hearing it is suspicious

I’m certain if Daniel’s car had a distinct sound then the neighbors know it. I experience this personally. I believe it’s likely this was accurate which leads me to these next couple thoughts related to the redacted statements and someone coming/going

I find it interesting that Daniel so specially notes that he always had his phone when he leaves his house so that M can track him pushing the idea that he always had it pg 17. That would make sense if he did leave and didn’t want them to know - though he also notes on page 15 that when he left to search he didn’t even take his Phone

Pg 7 says M heard kids but Daniel never really woke up Pg 9 says that M was up and heard the kids in her room so she took Meadow back to her room so she could sleep. This would not match if the kids left by car. She says she didn’t hear them first and Daniel says he didn’t hear them first. But this report is a bit different than what Daniel has said as himself hearing them and how he reported it on pg 15 and 17 of docs and

‘The house is just silent’: Stepdad speaks out as exhaustive search for missing N.S. children enters fifth day

The stepfather of two missing children in a rural area of Nova Scotia’s Pictou County is speaking out as the exhaustive search for the children enters its fifth day.

www.ctvnews.ca

I wonder if one of these folks is the redacted witness on page 23

I also wonder if all of the times in the report from that am are redacted because they easily don’t make sense

In the article about being heard he makes sure to note that he took M’s vehicle to search and that vehicle is silent https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova...hildren-court-documents-car-vehicle-9.6943179

Lilly and Jack Sullivan Documents - 1 — the Canadian Gothic

searcn and seizure application related to telephones belonging to Daniel and Malehya

thecanadiangothic.com