- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,025
- Reaction score
- 36,279
This isn't a court of law. It's a public discussion forum.with so many prosecutors , someone has to defend
This isn't a court of law. It's a public discussion forum.with so many prosecutors , someone has to defend
The police were called to Mickey D's because a customer recognized him and told an employee who then called LE. There was a huge BOLO out for LM everywhere at that time.they said the police were called to mcdonalds because he had overstayed his welcome which is rather strange because he had only been there 30 minutes and was still eating
Not when the evidence clearly shows it was LM who committed the crime. Logical thinking and the massive amount of evidence against him so far points to LM as being guilty with huge flashing red arrows. IMOwith so many prosecutors , someone has to defend
Is there a link for that? I don't recall seeing on MSM that he was accused of loitering. Thanks.but he was also accused of lottering which he clearly wasnt doing
but he was also accused of lottering which he clearly wasnt doing
but he was also accused of lottering which he clearly wasnt doing
well why did they say it clearly it wasnt true for what reason would they say it they did say it and it wasnt true.
it has a lot of implications on what is and isnt admissible evidence
@mrCit says it here he outstayed his welcome, which is clearly untrue Lawyer of Luigi Mangione says murder suspect's rights were violated in McDonald's arrest
Sounds like they were giving him courtesy notice not to create a scene, that he could go quickly and quietly with them.LM at McD's. Loitering? Overstaying his Welcome?
@mrC
From linked article:*
"The officers entered and blocked Mangione from leaving as he sat at a corner table by “forming a human law enforcement wall” around him, Dickey writes. The aggressive posture of the officers effectively detained Mangione..."
Sooo, two officers ="human law enforcement wall” = detention? Maybe, IDK.
Did the two officers explicitly tell LM, he
"... looked suspicious and/or overstayed his welcome...”?
Is this claim unequivocally true? Possibly, IDK.
Or did atty's motion claim LM thought LE thought that
LM "... looked suspicious and/or overstayed ...”?
I hope video & audio of the arrest related acions will emerge.
Likely imo, but not until trial.
_____________________________
* Feb. 28, 2025 article
This, from Thomas M. Dickey's ct-filed motion:
“At no time did the two (2) officers indicate that [Mangione] was free to go...” “Nor did they explain the reasons as to why Defendant was being detained; other than that, he looked suspicious and/or overstayed his welcome as a customer at McDonald’s.”
![]()
Lawyer of Luigi Mangione says murder suspect's rights were violated in McDonald's arrest
Luigi Mangione’s Pennsylvania attorney says police arrested the lead suspect in the slaying of a healthcare CEO improperly, tainting evidence.www.usatoday.com
Sounds like they were giving him courtesy notice not to create a scene, that he could go quickly and quietly with them.
Plus an opportunity to identify himself.
They didn't lead with a battering ram and raw force.
Cool, calm, and collected.
JMO
<snipped for focus>Luigi was brought down by a hash brown.
<snipped for focus>Right.
Luigi was brought down by a hash brown.
He was a paying customer, still eating, not loitering.
He was recognized due to the proliferating amount of pictures of him once he revealed his face at the hostel.
He was not arrested due to eating at a McDonald’s. Please.
He was arrested because he had to remove his mask to eat and he was identified.
He’s not even pretending he didn’t kill the CEO. When he was arrested he had his backpack with his multi-page manifesto, statement of purpose, and self-justification, which all amounted to a confession. Plus the evidence with the ghost gun.
This is the evidence that has been revealed. Not just theoretical.
IMO plus facts as released by LE.
Thanks for that link.it says it here he outstayed his welcome, which is clearly untrue Lawyer of Luigi Mangione says murder suspect's rights were violated in McDonald's arrest
Yes, loitering wouldn't result in an innocent person being arrested for murder. Besides, wasn't he eating his hashbrown? ergo, he wasn't loitering.Thanks for that link.
This is Luigi's Defense Lawyer speaking dramatically. Of course she will present the most egregious accusations against LE and how his arrest was handled.
It will up to the Judge to decide if LM's rights (ha - what about Brian Thompson's rights?) were violated and what is or isn't allowed in at trial.
JMO