Responding to this from yesterday's closed thread:
"I don't understand people's focus on his Goodreads list, aren't people used to reading ideas from authors who are completely opposite to theirs in order to (in a way) ''protect'' themselves and get a full picture of who are the crazies in society past and present? Maybe I think so because I am a Goodreads volunteer librarian but I read widely, things that I am passionate about and also things that are completely outside my realm/moral values/beliefs to get an insight on what others feel/think, and sort of understand how they react. His Goodreads list (if I did not know he has killed someone) does not tell me anything other than he has an inquisitive mind."
@Columbo Was The Best
Three things:
First and foremost, it was one of the first things we were able to read that made him 'human' to us, and not some character in a true crime fiction movie that many people had made him out to be. I don't think it's unnatural to jump to one of the first resources of data that's publicly available when trying to learn who he is.
Second, while I think there are many people like you, it's not uncommon for people to only read literature or consume media that aligns with their ideals. Most of us know a lot more about what believe than what we don't.
Lastly, he wasn't just posting what he read - he left comments and favorited quotes, which is a step further than just trying to have a balanced point of view / perspective on issues. It provides insight into his way of thinking, which is very interesting when dealing with someone who will go to these great lengths to prove a point.
JMO