It's not like her intoxication led to her imagining the murders or messing up the timeline (by all collective indicators, IMO). I think BK's eyebrows are distinct enough that the jury will believe her regardless of her state.After watching some of the recent findings (I think) on CourtTV today, I wonder how credible the surviving housemate will be considering she admitted to being drunk when she woke up to see the killer and his "bushy eyebrows" yet seemed to have a fascination with eyebrows according to her drawings that were found on her walls. This is definitely not me shaming or blaming. Just a matter of fact from what I heard that if her testimony will be accepted or if she will be hammered by the defense.
I fully believe Dateline's reporting that LE has evidence that BK purchased a knife. I'll go as far to say, IMO, he checked out of Amazon on March 30th 2022 with the knife and/or a sheath. And now we know for sure that his viewing history is likely highly incriminating and adds nefarious context to what would otherwise be a defendable knife purchase (he likes to hunt, he's a collector etc).
I know he bought the ka bar knife from amazon but they are there. as well as
can't access the website from here in the UK. so cant get specifix assuming they still sell the one the witness saw.
she woke up to see the killer and his "bushy eyebrows" yet seemed to have a fascination with eyebrows according to her drawings that were found on her walls.
It really is, I so agree Meg. Those poor young people/victims. Going from seemingly living and enjoying life to its fullest one day, to four young adult lives ended brutally by a madman and two left having to deal with the aftermath/trauma, the next. Unfathomable.It's getting real now.
The fear
It's palpable.
With all of the LE agencies that were working the 1122 King Rd residence, for many days after the murders, and with the number of investigators that were meticulously combing over every inch of that property, there is no way that a glove that was connected to the murders lay on the ground, mere feet from the house, for a week, without being discovered. I will not be persuaded otherwise, nor would many other people, imo. If that glove, with apparently unknown male DNA, and I only saw it listed as a single glove, not a pair, is connected in any way at all with the murders, it is most likely because it was worn by an investigator, who accidentally improperly disposed of it, as they were leaving the home, but most likely not connected at all. JMOAT is talking about a glove which was found on Nov. 20, 2022 by CSI, NOT the glove found by the YouTuber on Nov. 28, 2022. Totally different glove or gloves - at the last hearing, they were described as "gloves." I've provided links to this information previously.
Way back there were reports that one of them was outside the room, or just outside the door to the room. We had discussions on here about who it was….X or E.It's an interesting phenomena that I've seen in crime documentaries on tv. The person making the discovery of the body fails to make observations like this (seeing blood/wounds).
It's interesting that they only saw Xana, as we know Ethan was in the room with her. I wonder if she was near the door or something.
They’re too important to the timeline not to testify. They’re also important in explaining the events chronologically.Imo, there isn't any reason for BF or DM to testify. Ive felt this all along.
They need to be protected and kept away from the meanies and negative people who are out there ready to pounce on them.
The evidence will be enough to convict BK.
moo
Usually, the crime lab has the DNA of all the investigators who were on scene, as well as the police, paramedics, victims and anyone else known to have been on the scene and they compare that DNA to whatever DNA evidence they find so they don't accidentally mistake something "improperly disposed of" for evidence. That it is unknown male DNA is interesting. The glove or gloves (still not sure which it was) was/were found during CSI's official yard search of 1122 at a time where the scene was being guarded by LE 24x7. Other than that, I don't have much of an opinion of this piece of evidence yet other than being aware the DNA in the blood inside the glove or gloves didn't match any known person associated with the scene and it was male. For me, more information is needed. I'm not someone who is quick to decide anything about a piece of evidence. I prefer to hear about everything that was found first. It will be quite some time before a full picture emerges for me - probably during the trial.With all of the LE agencies that were working the 1122 King Rd residence, for days after the murders, and with the number of investigators that were meticulously combing over every inch of that property, there is no way that a glove that was connected to the murders lay on the ground, mere feet from the house, for a week, without being discovered. I will not be persuaded otherwise, nor would many other people, imo. If that glove, with apparently unknown male DNA, and I only saw it listed as a single glove, not a pair, is connected in any way at all with the murders, it is most likely because it was worn by an investigator, who accidentally improperly disposed of it, as they were leaving the home. JMO
Poor girl. You see a scary stranger in your house, but he walks right by you. You try, in a drunken state, to find out what’s going on, but nobody answers. How could your mind go to murder? It can’t possibly be. You have to be imagining it, people don’t just walk into a house, kill everyone, then just walk out without giving you a second thought. It can’t be real. It’s crazy to think about. You convince yourself you’re just drunk and everyone is asleep. Until the morning, when you find out the truth. And immediately know the guy you saw was part of it.
JMOO but I believe this phenomena could be more at play IF there wasn’t 3 to 4 (possibly another) different people who spoke to the dispatcher. It seems unlikely to me that ALL of them would not mention any injuries or any blood. If the 911 call was limited to one or even both of the surviving roommates I could see it being plausible the shock factor affecting what was said to 911, but 4 people? That’s a lot.It's an interesting phenomena that I've seen in crime documentaries on tv. The person making the discovery of the body fails to make observations like this (seeing blood/wounds).
It's interesting that they only saw Xana, as we know Ethan was in the room with her. I wonder if she was near the door or something.
I am not sure that all of the people who talked to the 9-1-1 operator had been into the house. Certainly 100+ threads into the case, I cannot easily find this, so take it for what it's worth, but, IIRC, DM and BF were outside the house when the call was made, and several students had come over, I THINK because someone had been called to come over and see if they could get someone to wake up, or maybe even the surviving roommates were unable to get into XK's room because someone was basically lying against the door, maybe. The phone was probably just being passed around, to someone who was not in such a state of shock, as I believe one of the roommates did, or almost did pass out. JMOJMOO but I believe this phenomena could be more at play IF there wasn’t 3 to 4 (possibly another) different people who spoke to the dispatcher. It seems unlikely to me that ALL of them would not mention any injuries or any blood. If the 911 call was limited to one or even both of the surviving roommates I could see it being plausible the shock factor affecting what was said to 911, but 4 people? That’s a lot.
I’m not alleging they knew something or were hiding something, but it seems odd that all of those who spoke to 911 seemed to not mention anything about what was otherwise described as a total blood bath per the Coroner and the victims’ families. I think we all saw the photos of blood dripping down the foundation. If I saw someone with even a small amount of blood or injury, I’m struggling to see how my mind would get to “unconscious” and we know this victim was very far from having a small injury. JMOO.
I don’t think they all saw her. I think it was one person and then things were relayed to the others.JMOO but I believe this phenomena could be more at play IF there wasn’t 3 to 4 (possibly another) different people who spoke to the dispatcher. It seems unlikely to me that ALL of them would not mention any injuries or any blood. If the 911 call was limited to one or even both of the surviving roommates I could see it being plausible the shock factor affecting what was said to 911, but 4 people? That’s a lot.
I’m not alleging they knew something or were hiding something, but it seems odd that all of those who spoke to 911 seemed to not mention anything about what was otherwise described as a total blood bath per the Coroner and the victims’ families. I think we all saw the photos of blood dripping down the foundation. If I saw someone with even a small amount of blood or injury, I’m struggling to see how my mind would get to “unconscious” and we know this victim was very far from having a small injury. JMOO.