- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
- Messages
- 13,066
- Reaction score
- 103,519
Ok, that's 13 years old. It's come a very, very long way since then.
No one was using a fingerprint brush on that sheath, and your other post discusses touch DNA being merely present at the scene. We all know that's dubious stuff, especially in a college house.
This was on an item the killer absolutely touched, so none of this stuff applies to this situation.
Of course the defense would have us believe that random DNA that was found was relevant, so your posts do help show why they're wrong.
The defense is scared BK's DNA's is mystery DNA. They should know by now. No information has come out that more than the sheath is BK's DNA.