I think that it's a pretty ridiculous theory of events that a jury will find hard to believe.lol. Driven away, killed somewhere else, and kindly returned to the most dangerous location to a perpetrator; the place the victims disappeared from, and the place where people would be looking for them.
They should go with literally anything but this. It’s not just stupid, it’s insane.
we are like 2 hours in to a trial that is i think i read supposed to take a month. we know nothing yet. and the way it's going, we aren't going to know much until the final verdict.he's gonna walk here!....this case is thinner than thin
I was surprised. Killer(s) gets away with kidnapping two girls, brings them somewhere and kills them. Instead of driving for miles and finding a secluded dump spot, it's decided yeahh bring them back to the very place guaranteed to be teaming with cops and searchers. Who are they going to say did these crimes Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum? Just moronic, IMO AJMOAbsolutely no surprises in the opening statements, IMO. Lets see how each side will go about laying their cases. Thank you for sharing!
Can you imagine how difficult that would have been while having a baby goat in your jacket?lol. Driven away, killed somewhere else, and kindly returned to the most dangerous location to a perpetrator; the place the victims disappeared from, and the place where people would be looking for them.
They should go with literally anything but this. It’s not just stupid, it’s insane.
While utilizing a respirator to boot. lol, we’ve come a long way.Can you imagine how difficult that would have been while having a baby goat in your jacket?
Anyone have an idea on how Ganote and Hanley have heard from inside the courtroom, when there seemingly hasn't been a break yet?
And another was a news photographer.They said one was a wire service, so at least one was MSM.
Maybe the prosecutor will fatten it up a bit as time goes by?he's gonna walk here!....this case is thinner than thin
What do you think of the defense's scenario? Is it plausible?Maybe the prosecutor will fatten it up a bit as time goes by?
I'm not as sure as you that he'll walk. It's iffy. IMO
Defense got nothing... Similar to most defense case (not all) but most, they're reaching. Their story makes no sense- y'all know what that means. jmoThe defense’s opening statement focused on inconsistent witness descriptions, their client’s mental health and added bullet testing is inconclusive. They added the girls were likely abducted on Monday afternoon, driven away from the bridge, and killed somewhere else.
The defense told the jurors they believe Abby and Libby’s bodies were then placed near the bank of Deer Creek early Tuesday morning.
Allen's attorneys said law enforcement can not explain the hair found intertwined on Abby’s hands that doesn’t match Richard Allen. The defense asked jurors to consider there is no DNA linking Allen to the murders.
So the DT is still going with the girls removed from the area taken elsewhere and killed only to be returned to the location they were found at the following morning, while the woods and trails were crawling with LE and search volunteers, friend and family of the missing girls.
I think this is a mistake on their part and maybe why they decided at the eleventh hour to withdraw their field trip to monon high bridgeI suspect a trip to the scene of the crime would only serve to highlight how very unlikely it is that events happened as they describe.
As Always - JMO
Doesn't have to be, they don't have to prove or disprove anything state has the total burdenWhat do you think of the defense's scenario? Is it plausible?
so neither witness who gave descriptions for sketches are being called by state, I wonder if defence will call them, the jury will then be left to ponder why the state never called them
Why would they want the photos out?