You asked me this question and I'm having a hard time answering.
"Could you imagine what might have unfolded had all P alleged events happened except for SC driving by that day?"
When the PCA came out, I believed what was said. Then came the D's version, loaded with citations, page numbers, minute markers and that weighed heavily. Then I listened to all the background noise (liars, clowns, twisters) and gave that some weight.
Now comes SC's testimony, filled with inconsistencies and proof of some of the D statements were true. Now I have to question all the rest of her statements. If I was a juror, only knowing what we know at this time, I wouldn't find her credible.
How do you imagine things would have unfolded?