- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 16,305
- Reaction score
- 270,190
It is SICK that they want to appeal the verdict based on BW. Remember that subpoena, slapped down at trial? He was in the stand, they cutoff have questioned him all they liked.
BW does not exonerate RA. RA confirms BW.
Just like RA confirmed don't the juveniles which stuck a pin in the timeline, corroborated by the girls, RA stuck a pin in the timeline with BW. RA was there when BW arrived, whichever minute that was.
RA didn't leave at 1:30. Didn't leave at 2:15. By his own admission, he was somewhere down the hill when BW drove by around 2:30 +/-. How could he possibly have known that unless he was there?
Sticks in BW's garage (or was it his parents'?) -- BW has something RA doesn't have. An alibi. For before and after, and thanks to RA, during. He was driving in his van.
RA exonerated BW.
And convicted himself.
JMO
BW does not exonerate RA. RA confirms BW.
Just like RA confirmed don't the juveniles which stuck a pin in the timeline, corroborated by the girls, RA stuck a pin in the timeline with BW. RA was there when BW arrived, whichever minute that was.
RA didn't leave at 1:30. Didn't leave at 2:15. By his own admission, he was somewhere down the hill when BW drove by around 2:30 +/-. How could he possibly have known that unless he was there?
Sticks in BW's garage (or was it his parents'?) -- BW has something RA doesn't have. An alibi. For before and after, and thanks to RA, during. He was driving in his van.
RA exonerated BW.
And convicted himself.
JMO