A kind FYI, a partial source was posted not a week ago on the previous page but I’ll be happy to clear things up just for you.
3 of the 4 eyewitnesses called by the prosecution who saw BG are listed in the last MSM article I posted upthread on just the previous page. They are RV, BW & Betsy Blair.
- The state showed a photo of the "Bridge Guy" and Voorhies said, "That was the man I had waved at on the trail."
- Wilber testified that she believed the man she saw walking on the bridge was the man seen in the photo shared by investigators.
- Blair also said the man she saw on the bridge is the man in the photo released by police of "Bridge Guy."
Testimony and cross-examination of the state's witness, ISP crime scene investigator Brian Olehy, continued on day four of the Delphi Murders trial.
www.wrtv.com
The 4th is Sarah Carbaugh. Here is a snippet from the trial transcripts which were released about a month ago. They can be a valuable source, if you require them. I’ve posted them before & evidently you haven’t read them either. Here is a snippet of SC’s testimony from Volume 12, page 193, line 11, under direct examination by Chief Deputy Prosecutor Stacey Diener (she’s the Q & SC is the A, for precise clarity):
Q And so I’m going to show you what’s been marked as State’s Exhibit 210; do you recognize this picture?
A Yes.
Q And did you see it on the news?
A Yes.
Q And when you saw it on the news, did you recognize the image?
A Yes.
Q And what did you recognize it as?
A I recognized it as the man I saw earlier covered in mud and blood on the road.
Q And the one that you just marked, at least the area –
A Yeah, of the area of where it was.
Q Okay. And so you became familiar that this person was referred to as Bridge Guy?
A Um-hmm, yes.
View attachment 607987
ETA Emboldening for emphasis. All 4 BG
eyewitnesses identified the man they saw as BG who is by default Richard Allen unless his conviction is overturned, which IMO likely isn’t happening since his appellate attorneys are requesting an extension to file their motion. I arrive at that opinion because if there were any low hanging fruit (easy pickings for it to be reversed) they’d be in front of the judge already.
I hope this helps. See you in a couple of weeks or so.