Michelle Jeanis, an associate professor in the criminal justice department at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, called the case an “anomaly” due to the unusual facts and lack of physical evidence.
“This case doesn’t fit the typical pattern we see in child disappearances,” said Jeanis, who specializes in missing persons and juvenile justice. “There’s usually some form of evidence suggesting foul play. This resembles what we call ‘quiet disappearances’ in adult missing persons cases — where there’s simply nothing to go on.”
A few aspects of the case strike Jeanis as particularly unusual, including the children’s absence from school in the days leading up to their disappearance.
According to the children’s stepfather, Daniel Martell, they were not in school on the Thursday or Friday — the day they went missing — due to illness. Additionally, they were off on Wednesday because of a professional development day.
“It might just be a case of really unfortunate timing that they were unaccounted for during those 48 hours before they vanished,” “But that’s one detail that really stands out to me.”
“That doesn’t seem to fit this situation,” Jeanis noted. “From what we know, the children were in their backyard in a remote, rural area — not walking to school or passing through a public space where a quick abduction might occur.”
“For it to be a classic stranger abduction, the person would’ve had to deliberately choose
those children."
Two weeks have passed since siblings Lilly Sullivan, 6, and Jack Sullivan, 4, disappeared without a trace in rural Nova […]
checkforme.co.uk