LE have told the public what they think the children were wearing when they disappeared. IMO far too much time has passed for video evidence from May to be useful eight months later. Perhaps there’s other people, including clerks and customers, captured the video who don’t want their image put to the public for scrutiny? I know that wouldn’t exactly thrill me.
I think this case will continue to be quiet until more ground searches can be conducted in the spring.
JMO
Bbm.
Re. the 2nd bolded : All they would need to do is to blur them.
That would be an easy solution, would it not ?
Re. the 1st bolded : Actually, there might be a different take on that, and this is why :
Were they wearing the exact clothes they 'vanished' in ?
Seeing the video could be very important.
This to me might mean something happened (wandered) soon after they arrived home.
Whether it be wandering or something else, which we don't know. LE seemed to have ruled out an abduction, so that's off the table.
Were they wearing regular slip-ons, or laced up-type shoes, or their boots ?
There was mention that both kids liked wearing their boots.
Also if they disappeared in daytime clothing, that might mean no one helped them put their pajamas on, or that they wandered off early that evening
before any bedtime rituals (snack, potty, bath, jammies, storytime, etc.).
We know what time the 911 call about their going missing came in, we still do not know what time they actually vanished, and that is troubling.
If they vanished between 8pm and midnight, DM could have driven around looking for them until the 911 call came in.
The neighbors heard vehicle movement that night but it's not been proven whose car was being driven.
The case may be growing cold to many including LE; but I still have questions.
Imo.
www.saltwire.com
