We don't really know what he was doing. We can see from his mileage that BK was likely driving at night in the Poconos in 2021 and the habit continued in Pullman. We also know that prior to that he used to go night running. It seems BK likes to be active and moving at night but that's really all we have proof of, thus far. Night owls make up about 22-24% of the human population so none of this, including night driving, is outside the range of normal human behavior. Even wasting money on something (in this case gasoline) is, frankly, normal human behavior.
I will be curious to find out if his night running buddy ever witnessed any stalker behavior or if anyone ever heard him talk about fantasizing about committing murder. Hopefully all will be revealed at the trial, whenever that will be.
All JMO.
Not sure what you mean by "fantasizing." There's no way to tell if someone else is fantasizing or merely thinking (not sure everyone even uses the words the same way.
We know for a fact that he was
thinking some about murder, because he was studying it. He took a classes that dealt with it. It's grim stuff. I study it too. If "fantasize" means "thinking about doing something oneself," that's one thing. To me it just means "using one's imagination to try and figure out what went down" in a certain situation. It's part of my job, actually; I interview criminals (well, I haven't done it since COVID, but did it for years). I then try to connect dots, go back, talk to them some more. When they think about their crimes, is that fantasizing? When someone thinks about other people's crimes (like everyone here on WS and of course, criminals themselves), is that fantasizing?
Because if so, I'll bet many boxes of donuts that Kohberger did fantasize about murder. A lot. But I'd call it "thinking" about murder, and since we know he was in favor of Rational Choice Theory, he probably thought of it as "analyzing" murder, troubleshooting what happened (I do this sometimes, myself - so far it hasn't led to committing any crimes).
For example, many threads here on WS have WSers mentioning what mistakes a criminal made and how they could have been avoided. Isn't that the same as planning/thinking through a crime?
My point is that having a mental file of potential crimes and how to improve on those crimes could, in the right individual, result in an attempt at the "perfect crime," but doesn't really account for why this particular would-be criminologist actually did it. I have my theories on this, currently based on everything I see and know about Kohberger. I am betting that plenty of people heard him talk about murder, since that was the subject of many of his classes. He may have talked about how RCT works too (which is a way of talking about how to improve and troubleshoot one's criminal activities). I don't know how Prof B could know that was one of his favorite theories (along with Script Analysis, which focuses on memorizing a series of steps in order to commit a crime - when it's used in criminology, anyway), if he didn't talk about these theories with her in discussion and papers.
IMO.