Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #199

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #721
  • #722
I'm left wondering if RA committed more crimes in the 5 years he was free to roam. I guess I'm pretty confident the prosecution will prevail. mOO
I've wondered about crimes that he may have committed before this one. Seems like quite a violent act for it to be his first one MOO.
 
  • #723
ADMIN NOTE:

This trial has just started.

Some members are already over alerting. That is a violation of Websleuths TOS and may result in loss of posting privileges. Only Report when it is a clear violation of TOS.

If you want a link, ask for it on thread and it just might be provided before you Report.

One member's idea of snark might differ from that of another member. Unless it is something particularly egregious, please just scroll and roll.

Members who engage in bickering may be removed from the discussion.

And remember, this is TRIAL DISCUSSION, not to rehash the entire case.

Please post accordingly. Thanks !!

Sillybilly
WS Administrator
 
  • #724
Oh my.

Is the defense team wanting to bring this up in this trial?

I haven't seen anything about that, either. None of the fillings I've read have any mention of such a thing; can you link it?

I believe this is it.

Motion Filed
Ex Parte Motion
Filed By:
Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
09/30/2024​
[td]
09/30/2024
[/td]​

State's response


Motion In Limine Filed
Motion in Limine - IPAS.pdf
Filed By:
State of Indiana
File Stamp:
10/14/2024​
[td]
10/15/2024
[/td]​

[td]
[/td]​
 
  • #725
  • #726
My impression is that they filed to withdraw after all the jurors were selected.

They may have looked at the jurors, made an assessment as to whether or not some of the jurors would have significant issues getting to all the areas, and decided it would not be feasible.
Thanks for this. I was thinking the same -- especially knowing the State already admitted exhibits and drones to avoid the same.
 
  • #727
I think it is an appalling decision by the Judge to exclude the sketches
 
  • #728
I've wondered about crimes that he may have committed before this one. Seems like quite a violent act for it to be his first one MOO.
Same here.
 
  • #729
I think it is an appalling decision by the Judge to exclude the sketches
I disagree. The sketches were use as part of the investigation to generate leads. Police sketches of suspects based on witness IDs have always been very hit or miss. They are not intended to serve as positive identifications. JMO
 
  • #730
I think you linked me to the wrong one. That one interviews BM and another defense atty with no discussion about a falsified affidavit.
Sorry I linked it wrong. It's on the Delphi Media thread #2. Pg 20, post #400
 
  • #731
  • #732
I've wondered about crimes that he may have committed before this one. Seems like quite a violent act for it to be his first one MOO.
He's certainly an outlier, as there are a couple strange things here. First is that he doesn't have a criminal record; there's almost always a build up to something like this. Secondly, double child abductions are incredibly rare. While watching that Evansdale documentary on HBO, I learned that there have been something like 17 events like that since 1970.
 
  • #733
  • #734
Any evidence that is submitted as well as any audio/video recordings in a court trial are apparently public records in Indiana.

I'm wondering though if certain material can be suppressed from public viewing if too sensitive. Eg Crime photos.
Yes those are confidential. I don't know about RA's confessions?
 
  • #735
He's certainly an outlier, as there are a couple strange things here. First is that he doesn't have a criminal record; there's almost always a build up to something like this. Secondly, double child abductions are incredibly rare. While watching that Evansdale documentary on HBO, I learned that there have been something like 17 events like that since 1970.
And two or three of those double events are linked to the Texas Killing Fields cluster, possibly by the same perpetrator. So it's even rarer than it seems.

MOO
 
  • #736
They won’t get a copy but they’ll get approximately 22 seconds each to look at evidence after trial each day, during a 15 min block of time Gull has graciously permitted them.
Then I guess we'll never hear them entirely nor read them. Maybe after the trial.
 
  • #737
  • #738

1729264641544.png1729264683453.png

YBG looks like RA in this line up, imo. Eyes, nose, mouth, lines at mouth, chin, eyebrow.

YBG has the same hooded eyes as RA. They don’t seem to be too common?

YBG is shown in detail with no depiction of clothing the witness being presumably close enough to see the face clearly could describe clothing as well.

So we can assume YBG is in RA/BG clothing since we don’t see and weren’t told otherwise.

Looking at this today lined up with his present appearance I believe the sketches, if submitted as an exhibit, could be helpful to the Prosecution.


all imo
 
  • #739
Yes those are confidential. I don't know about RA's confessions?

I feel whatever is submitted into evidence, including any recordings of Richard Allen's conversations, would likely be accessible.
 
  • #740
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
1,574
Total visitors
1,698

Forum statistics

Threads
635,468
Messages
18,677,015
Members
243,247
Latest member
Connector_of-Dots
Back
Top