What?
What? What?
What?
Order Issued Order on Courtroom Decorum. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Baldwin, Andrew Joseph Noticed: Rozzi, Bradley Anthony Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR Noticed: Diener, Stacey Lynn Noticed: Auger, Jennifer Jones Order Signed: 10/18/2024 |
Order Issued Order on Motion for Leave to Intervene and for Public Access to Court Records. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Baldwin, Andrew Joseph Noticed: Rozzi, Bradley Anthony Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR Noticed: Diener, Stacey Lynn Noticed: Auger, Jennifer Jones Order Signed: 10/22/2024 |
Order Issued Order on State's Motion in Limine Regarding Defense Witness. Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Baldwin, Andrew Joseph Noticed: Rozzi, Bradley Anthony Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR Noticed: Diener, Stacey Lynn Noticed: Auger, Jennifer Jones Order Signed: |
I hope he does. The only way he will is if the trial is going so badly for the defense that he is forced to.Anybody think he will testify? I don't think he will
I have been a woman in her late 20s. Under no circumstances, even when drunk, would I have ever stopped to ask a bloody male if they are good.I saw some video footage of that road recently - it is quite narrow and nothing like what I would have imagined.
I doubt anyone driving it would miss the details of someone they drove by whatsoever unless flying by, distracted or not interested.
But if someone saw someone walking that stretch of road bloody and muddy or muddy and bloody why did they not stop to ask if that person was okay or at the very least report it to the police?
And now that I have seen that road and area it really makes me wonder.
JMO MOO JMT
@Niner sorry I didn't copy you before.
Order Issued
Order on Courtroom Decorum.
Judicial Officer:
Gull, Frances -SJ
Noticed:
McLeland, Nicholas Charles
Noticed:
Baldwin, Andrew Joseph
Noticed:
Rozzi, Bradley Anthony
Noticed:
Luttrull, James David JR
Noticed:
Diener, Stacey Lynn
Noticed:
Auger, Jennifer Jones
Order Signed:
10/18/2024 Order Issued
Order on Motion for Leave to Intervene and for Public Access to Court Records.
Judicial Officer:
Gull, Frances -SJ
Noticed:
McLeland, Nicholas Charles
Noticed:
Baldwin, Andrew Joseph
Noticed:
Rozzi, Bradley Anthony
Noticed:
Luttrull, James David JR
Noticed:
Diener, Stacey Lynn
Noticed:
Auger, Jennifer Jones
Order Signed:
10/22/2024 Order Issued
Order on State's Motion in Limine Regarding Defense Witness.
Judicial Officer:
Gull, Frances -SJ
Noticed:
McLeland, Nicholas Charles
Noticed:
Baldwin, Andrew Joseph
Noticed:
Rozzi, Bradley Anthony
Noticed:
Luttrull, James David JR
Noticed:
Diener, Stacey Lynn
Noticed:
Auger, Jennifer Jones
Order Signed:
[td]
10/23/2024
[/td]
[td]
10/23/2024
[/td]
[td]
10/23/2024
[/td]
The video / still photo has also apparently had an impact on their description of who they saw that day:That the person they all described and testified that was bridge guy does not match Richard Allen. JMO
So she probably saw BG on one side and the other ppl on the other side of the road. Is that correct?
Impossible.
RA was on suicide watch from 1 April 2023.
3 March 2023 comes before 1 April 2023.
Respectfully, there is not a snowball’s chance in hell the motive was not sexual, considering the fact that one girl was nude and the other had been nude.I think one could read a sexual motive into crime due to Libby being naked and at one point Abby was partially or fully undressed, we will never know if Abby was fully naked at some point,
But lack of evidence that either were sexually abused means state can't presume to know what the intent of the perpetrator was, and whether it was sexually motivated so opining as he did in opening that RA took the girls to sexually assault them needs evidence,
The idea that he was disturbed is opinion not fact,
I'm not sure yet, but I'll let you know when I find out.On the last one - is this re Tobin? Did she denied or grant that motion? TIA!And Thanks!
All of the media links support the idea the girls were alarmed because they all discuss that the girls were 'secretly' filming him as he was quickly approaching from behind.
Are you thinking they were not alarmed, but were just filming this stranger for some unknown reason?
What other reason would they have for filming him? Can you think of any?
As a woman driving alone, I would not stop and engage with a man who looked like he had mud and blood all him.I saw some video footage of that road recently - it is quite narrow and nothing like what I would have imagined.
I doubt anyone driving it would miss the details of someone they drove by whatsoever unless flying by, distracted or not interested.
But if someone saw someone walking that stretch of road bloody and muddy or muddy and bloody why did they not stop to ask if that person was okay or at the very least report it to the police?
And now that I have seen that road and area it really makes me wonder.
JMO MOO JMT
Interesting. I wonder if any other podcasters claim to have heard that? Or MSM maybe?Yes Day 4 The Murder Sheet podcast.
Also claim to hear a metallic sound between the words Guys and DTH which may be that of a gun racking.
certainly doesn't sound as if there was any wound described as coming from a serrated edge to me. So I will chuck the two bladed weapons, one with serrated edge, into the simply more lies and misstatements from the DT pile.
He said in the February deposition that he couldn’t determine if the killer was left or right handed and that a serrated knife may have been used.
Kohr then said after his deposition that a box cutter may have been used instead of a serrated knife, but did not inform the defense. News 8’s Kyla Russell said Rozzi showed upset in the courtroom after Kohr admitted his uncertainty about the weapon used and did not file a new report.
I get what you are saying but in my mind may is a long way from WAS. But I certainly see how multiple weapons works better for a defense trying to sell multiple perps.In fairness to all parties, from the same ME, he did testify in a deposition in February to the serrated blade. At best, I think this is likely open to a second professional opinion.
I’m going with the former.The "bloody" man testimony is a mess.
So either this LE is so bad they didn't write down that a witness saw a BLOODY MAN in the same day and place two girls were murdered and then LOST the taped interview where she confirmed it or she did not say he was bloody and is misremembering.
It's almost certainly the latter IMO.
Eyewitness testimony is easily compromised and experts have generally agreed the first recollection immediately after the incident is the most reliable. The more time that goes by, the less reliable the memory is. Most likely this witness saw a muddy man, reported as much to LE, but as days, weeks, months, years go by and she learns details of the crime from the news she starts to think that maybe she actually saw blood as well and eventually has a false memory that was bloody. This is a common issue and has been the cause of many overturned guilty verdicts.
Regardless, it doesn't sound like we can believe the man she saw was bloody. I think she misremembered but even if she didn't then LE ruined that piece of evidence by being terrible at their jobs.
It doesn't matter much overall, it was hardly a smoking gun, but I'm concerned that so many people here seem to think her saying he was bloody on the stand 7 years somehow means he was in fact, bloody. Always, always be skeptical of eyewitness testimony especially if it's changed over time!
I'm more over here wondering if she saw a muddy guy beside a "visibly stressed" girl in pink - is it possible she saw AW at the Mears lot with a man?This falls at random, as they say here.
If RA was gone long before SC saw muddy, bloody guy, why does the D care if he was muddy and bloody or just plain muddy? It wasn’t RA.
If it was RA, when, how, and why did he innocently get muddy but not bloody? Why did he never mention it?
I have been a woman in her late 20s. Under no circumstances, even when drunk, would I have ever stopped to ask a bloody male if they are good.
My male friends would, and have, and I literally walked and stood far far away, because I don't want anything to do with a situation that has left a grown adult male bloody and muddy.
All MOO