- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,959
- Reaction score
- 298,259
Snipped for focus.
Yes - the case really is this simple.
The only question is whether RA is the man the 3 girls saw. So the only way he can be innocent is if he left just minutes earlier, and his car is departing on the harvest store camera, and he saw 3 different girls around an hour or more earlier.
But where are those three mysterious girls?
^This, x2There's a very simple way of looking at the witness identifications that removes all of the noise here. The defense has focused on issues regarding clothing, height, and apparent changing accounts (lady who saw him covered in mud/blood). Ligette went out of his way to bolster this argument, tripping all over himself.
The most important witnesses are the group of 3 teens with the child. Allen got the number wrong it seems, but the timing fits perfectly, and he acknowledges this kid by mentioning something to the effect of them being babysat (pretty sure that's the characterization he used).
So three people (this group) who definitely saw the same person, had varying descriptions (two of them got his jacket/jeans right but other details wrong. They saw the photo of BG and recognized them as this same man. Even if one has an issue with the inconsistencies within the account, the odds of Allen passing another group of teens with a child when no other group came forward, seals the deal.
They saw BG, Allen saw them, BG - Allen.
And BB made three loops, encountering the juveniles, BG and Abby and Libby. She didn't encounter RA on her first loops, when he says he was there. She was best positioned to give census, for the amount of time she was there, and at the critical time.
The witness testimony is tight, not for the variances in human recall, but for the verified timestamps, and that all of them, RA included, only saw one man.
And no one saw him again, after BB saw him on the platform, Libby recorded him on the bridge, until he surfaced on the roadway, looking like someone who may have been in close contact with a creek, during the very time the crime was committed.
But RA says it best, "if that photo is from their phone, it's not me." He didn't say, "Hey, wait. I saw that guy."
JMO