m00c0w
It doesn’t matter; it’s over.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,992
- Reaction score
- 17,052
Not likely. That’s why there are 4 alternates.Does this mean someone else will be selected to fill the spot or...no.
JMO
Not likely. That’s why there are 4 alternates.Does this mean someone else will be selected to fill the spot or...no.
Defense has been pretending the girls were taken away and brought back. To me, this helps confirm they were already deceased by 4 pm. They never left the area.I mean, that's nothing new. We knew a long time ago it was fast and done. Someone will provide you with the good links but this isn't a a ha moment in the slightest
No. This is the reason they have alternates. Fortunately, this was apparently an alternate according to the first tweet we had on this.Does this mean someone else will be selected to fill the spot or...no.
So, several say that they really require DNA for them to be sure.
Even the presence of DNA doesn't stop people from doubting in other cases. We have Bryan Kohberger with his DNA found in the grooves of the clasp of a knife sheath--when a knife of some sort is known to be what was used in the murders --underneath/between the bodies of two of the murdered victims. And people still argue that isn't valid--the sheath could have belonged to one of the girls or a different murderer and unlucky BK could have just touched it at a knife store while trying out the clasp and didn't end up buying it. Or it could have been contaminated in the lab. Or the murderer could have gotten BK's DNA off the door handle of his car and put in the grooves of the sheath in order to frame him. I've seen all of those arguments, by both people on this board and by his lawyers.
ty!
Defense has been pretending the girls were taken away and brought back. To me, this helps confirm they were already deceased by 4 pm. They never left the area.
I don't think they can do that at this stage no.
Oh man, she had some great retorts there. This one is my favorite:@localguydonnie
Going through #Delphi trial pool notes that just came in before 4 o’clock…
Allen’s attorney Brad Rozzi during cross examination of Melissa Oberg, expert who pinned Allen’s gun as the source of the cartridge found near girl’s bodies…R: An unspent round and fired round are two different things.Oberg: They’re all loaded into a firearm the same way. Only difference is pressure. Ejector mark is ejector whether it’s fired or cycled. Firing process could use more research, but not the tool marking processR: Could have been cycled through other firearm?Oberg: It is possible.
Going through more notes (email compression makes the notes very tough to read)…R: You can’t say with any certainty where it (new cartridge used in testing) came from before you got it?Oberg: No.R: You don’t have a photo of that round in your 14-page report.Oberg: No, it was in my original notes.They talk about other rounds used in testing. Oberg chose to use the test fired round because it marked better than cycled rounds.R: (Those) aren’t the same.Oberg: “I don’t consider them different. They just didn’t mark as well.”•I think she’s referring to the test rounds that were cycled but again, pool notes are hard to read…
Rozzi continues to stress how the cycled crime scene cartridge and the test fired cartridge are not the same thing.Oberg: “I will keep repeating it’s the same way (loading cartridge), it just has a different pressure.”They continue to talk about specific extractors, gun builds, the condition of Allen’s gun, the tool marking verification process, who would make the final call if there were differing opinions.Rozzi asked if Allen’s gun condition could produce different markings in 2017 and 2022. Oberg responded with “can’t say. Should be similarities.”R: Fair for jury to draw its own conclusions based on photos of the test fired round?Oberg: Yes.State Objected. Judge sustained…
When going back to the discussion of expert disagreements and verification and who would have final say over analysis…R: “At the end of the day, it’s subjective.”Oberg: “I don’t know how you objectively measure subjectivity.”Oberg said she’s never had someone disagree with her analysis.Court back in session. Will update this information once more is received.
Good grief, what did he have in mind? No wonder jurors are staying away!!!
Rozzi puts on gloves and begins to pull out the Sig Sauer, he moves on after meeting with the Judge.![]()
Delphi Murders trial: Day 7 live blog
INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — Friday is the seventh day of testimonies in the trial of Delphi Murders suspect Richard Allen at the Carroll County Courthouse in Delphi. Allen, 52, is charged with murder and murder while committing or attempting to commit kidnapping in the deaths of 13-year-old Abigail...www.wishtv.com
Seems they could benefit from using Obergs strategy to work smarter not harder.The d version in their opening is a train wreck. i have no idea why they claimed something so easily disproved.
Because their pet theory, even less provable, was verboten.The d version in their opening is a train wreck. i have no idea why they claimed something so easily disproved.
Wait, WHAT!? I missed this. If a text came through at 4:06 PM, then Libby was already being held against her will or most likely, already deceased. She would have answered her grandma.
BBMTo be fair, yesterday Holeman took out the gun to show it to the jury for the first time, explained that he needed to check to make sure it was completely empty before it was further handled, and he proceeded to rack it twice. Murder Sheet said in last nights episode that in the quiet courtroom it was really loud and unnerving, given the theory that racking it was how the murderer threatened the girls into compliance.
![]()
The Delphi Murders: Richard Allen on Trial: Day Six: "It Doesn't Matter, It's Over"
We discuss the sixth day of Richard Allen's trial. We saw Allen's knives and boxcutters and heard more from the woman who uncovered the tip that led to this...murdersheetpodcast.com
"Holeman then opened a box containing the gun found at Allen’s home. He gave it a quick check to assure it was safe before displaying it to jurors."![]()
Delphi Murders trial: Day 6 live blog
Delphi Murders trial continues with testimony from Dr. Roland Kohr and Sarah Carbaugh. Allen accused of murdering Abby Williams and Libby German.www.wishtv.com
Maybe the released juror had a family emergency.WHY though? That's the answer we are looking for Kyla. Lol!!
Is there another media reporting on this?? I just don't care for this particular media guy. He seems so....pro defense without saying it.@localguydonnie
Going through #Delphi trial pool notes that just came in before 4 o’clock…
Allen’s attorney Brad Rozzi during cross examination of Melissa Oberg, expert who pinned Allen’s gun as the source of the cartridge found near girl’s bodies…
R: An unspent round and fired round are two different things.
Oberg: They’re all loaded into a firearm the same way. Only difference is pressure. Ejector mark is ejector whether it’s fired or cycled. Firing process could use more research, but not the tool marking process
R: Could have been cycled through other firearm?
Oberg: It is possible.
Going through more notes (email compression makes the notes very tough to read)…
R: You can’t say with any certainty where it (new cartridge used in testing) came from before you got it?
Oberg: No.
R: You don’t have a photo of that round in your 14-page report.
Oberg: No, it was in my original notes.They talk about other rounds used in testing. Oberg chose to use the test fired round because it marked better than cycled rounds.
R: (Those) aren’t the same.
Oberg: “I don’t consider them different. They just didn’t mark as well.”•I think she’s referring to the test rounds that were cycled but again, pool notes are hard to read…
Rozzi continues to stress how the cycled crime scene cartridge and the test fired cartridge are not the same thing.
Oberg: “I will keep repeating it’s the same way (loading cartridge), it just has a different pressure.”They continue to talk about specific extractors, gun builds, the condition of Allen’s gun, the tool marking verification process, who would make the final call if there were differing opinions.
Rozzi asked if Allen’s gun condition could produce different markings in 2017 and 2022.
Oberg responded with “can’t say. Should be similarities.”
R: Fair for jury to draw its own conclusions based on photos of the test fired round?
Oberg: Yes.
State Objected.
Judge sustained…
When going back to the discussion of expert disagreements and verification and who would have final say over analysis…
R: “At the end of the day, it’s subjective.”
Oberg: “I don’t know how you objectively measure subjectivity.”
Oberg said she’s never had someone disagree with her analysis.
Court back in session. Will update this information once more is received.
I cannot testify to the jacket or bullet, but certain corrosions can take years to develop on aluminum. How long should we wait for these test results? There are also different types of corrosion so more tests. Also, corrosion tests are destructive & it’s already been stated the round that was found needs to be kept intact for the tool markings as proof (the master template). Had they tested other rounds, they’d probably be scrutinized for doing so in that it’s "not the exact round".I'm not exactly sure I'm hoping that when I read a transcript they explain that to the jury along with other factors that could be in play as in how well was RA maintaining and using is firearm, there's no corrosion on the bullet but explain to me the juror how long it takes to be corroded in the weather conditions present and how the said bullet was in the ground, let me show you how when I did these tests it was approximately the same temperature and atmospheric pressure as when this happened outside etc etc
There are many people who don’t care that his mental state and medications received could have greatly influenced his “confessions”. As long as he said the words, that’s all that matters to them.I think its good they have expressed concerns about his mental state really. Clearly there have been some issues with mental health / medications administered etc... MOOO.
What a way of reminding the jury they never heard that sound in the video played for them…BBM
This is what I call a calculated stroke of genius. It was loud and unnerving. Wowzer! What a way to bring this back around to how racking it was how the murderer threatened the girls into compliance.