- Joined
- Oct 23, 2022
- Messages
- 9,439
- Reaction score
- 8,341
I offered a link to an approved source which references a topic that (AFAIK) has been declared taboo for discussion here at WS, but I felt may have been what @minor4th was referring to.Thanks. So for clarity, EF did not confess to murder, correct?
EF told his sister crime scene info. The sister told Murphy what she says EF told her. Murphy testified to what he heard from the sister, who heard it from EF.
Since Judge Gull has shut down everything related to this line of investigation, I am not letting my awareness of it affect my opinion of the evidence currently being presented in the trial of RA.
Personally, though, I felt EF’s query about whether he’d be in trouble if his spit was found on the girls was much more interesting than what his sister(s) reported, but especially in light of it; whether or not he claims to have personally committed the murder.
My main goal in providing the link was to find out if it’s what one of our verified attorneys was referring to, and I was actually hoping for some clarification about how/why previous admissions/confessions should be fair game for the defense, if the lead was investigated, and cleared.
MOO
I will say that in fairness, RA was apparently “cleared” at one time, too, so I understand why anyone might have questions about why his cleared file was fair game, but cleared files pertaining to other lines of investigation are perceived as a done deal.
IMO