GUILTY Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #220

  • #1,021
True.
But I still think it’s a big nothing. Just part of the process.
Oh, I agree, I just think it's important to specify that the subject of this isn't the Frank's motion itself, but the exhibits they were claiming as supporting evidence. We don't all have copies of those on our devices.

MOO
 
  • #1,022
But we didn't have access to the exhibits. Those were the photos etc they used to claim their ridiculous fiction. We could never see the photos because they included victim pictures.

MOO
So this is about the crime scene photos attached to the FM, that they had to return? Is that what this delay is all about? Didn't both sides have to return them because they were under seal? They must have been sent back to LE storage, locked up right? Maybe they aren't being held locally but by the state, because of the leak that occured?
 
  • #1,023
Here is the appellate attorney’s motion filed 2 days ago & explains, in part, what the appellate attorneys are requesting (page 2, item 3) - see attached below - along with Exhibits A, B & C. Quite a bit more than just photos but still following Andy down his Odin hole.

This is not a big deal at all. The court clerk simply did not provide these items yet because they weren’t part of the trial but a separate hearing (Franks). Why it was not just given to them is unknown but once they get it, they will be given another 30 days to present their case.

Short version, they’re going to challenge the PCA & also go down "Andy’s path" with the alternate suspects & also considering the MTCE, so all the "clown work". 🙄

More info here:


Bridge troll likely won’t be going anywhere if this is the best they’ve got.

MOO

ETA - added 3 exhibits & edited last sentence of first paragraph after "- see attached below -"; "if this is the best they’ve got".
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • #1,024
Here is the appellate attorney’s motion filed 2 days ago & explains, in part, what the appellate attorneys are requesting (page 2, item 3) - see attached below - along with Exhibits A, B & C. Quite a bit more than just photos but still following Andy down his Odin hole.

This is not a big deal at all. The court clerk simply did not provide these items yet because they weren’t part of the trial but a separate hearing (Franks). Why it was not just given to them is unknown but once they get it, they will be given another 30 days to present their case.

Short version, they’re going to challenge the PCA & also go down "Andy’s path" with the alternate suspects & also considering the MTCE, so all the "clown work". 🙄

More info here:


Bridge troll likely won’t be going anywhere if this is the best they’ve got.

MOO

ETA - added 3 exhibits & edited last sentence of first paragraph after "- see attached below -"; "if this is the best they’ve got".
Thank you for providing the pdfs; the link to the Appellate docket - apparently timed out.

Appellate Order below:

1759933659642.webp
 
  • #1,025
Clarifying - The Franks submission had two parts: the memo and its exhibits.

The Franks Memo was provided for in the appellate record; BUT the Clerk reports that the voluminous Franks Exhibits (from the Sept. 18, 2023 Franks-hearing motion).

Additionally, two of the MTCE Exhibits (Jan. 20, 2025) are also missing from the Clerks submission of the appellate record.

Latest Order - Per the 10/3/2025 order, the Court of Appeals states these missing Exhibits are part of the Clerk’s Record and must be included in the Appellant’s Appendix.

(I'd meant - earlier - to say that the MTCE Exhibits were also missing and ordered into the appellate record as well.)

Allen/his Appellate attnys can't submit his appellate to the Court of Appeals without the complete record.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
100
Guests online
2,645
Total visitors
2,745

Forum statistics

Threads
632,919
Messages
18,633,555
Members
243,334
Latest member
Caring Kiwi
Back
Top