- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 11,632
- Reaction score
- 153,309
There is a procedurally correct way, but I believe Judge Gull was trying to extend a professional courtesy to R&B. Big mistake on her part IMO.I don't know if there was a correct way for the judge to remove RA's attys of choice.
RA's 6th amendment right guarantees that RA is afforded access to an attorney to represent him, however it does NOT provide him the right to an attorney of his own choosing.
The issue I saw in the SCOIN hearings was that R&B had been emotionally and physically involved in the case for some time and RA wanted them to continue on as his legal counsel over Judge Gull's concerns of their Professional Misconduct.
MOO