Bergmann
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2022
- Messages
- 392
- Reaction score
- 2,497
Now onto MOO.
One of the many problems (transparency being the biggest issue) of judge Gull not allowing audio or video from the courtroom is that the bonafide journalists given press passes into court have to rely upon notebooks and recording lots of information quickly and accurately, which means that reports from any of the recognised outlets probably won't contain all the facts and also the way they synthesise what's going on and report it will also vary, so we need to be careful before jumping to any conclusions (and that's a good idea anyways in a complex case like this which begins as it should with the legal presumption of innocence until proven otherwise).
A good example from the WishTV blog is reporting that Baldwin said that Allen was gone by 1.30pm when other reporters have focused on his assertion that 'phone's don't lie' and that in RA's case his phone shows he had left by 2.15pm (we await the evidence backing this up to be presented of course).
Other MOO -
The defense has predictably come with things it previously hasn't emphasised or made much of. As above lets see the evidence.
Conversely the prosecution has kept in its opening to things we largely expected - the 3 Bs that Nick has focused the juries attention upon etc.
However what I would dearly love to see now is the mountain of evidence that it has been alleged was held back from the PCA to overwhelmingly prove the state's case in court.
Let's see the truth first, backed by weight of evidence, before justice is decided and dispensed.
For the avoidance of doubt, all MOO.
One of the many problems (transparency being the biggest issue) of judge Gull not allowing audio or video from the courtroom is that the bonafide journalists given press passes into court have to rely upon notebooks and recording lots of information quickly and accurately, which means that reports from any of the recognised outlets probably won't contain all the facts and also the way they synthesise what's going on and report it will also vary, so we need to be careful before jumping to any conclusions (and that's a good idea anyways in a complex case like this which begins as it should with the legal presumption of innocence until proven otherwise).
A good example from the WishTV blog is reporting that Baldwin said that Allen was gone by 1.30pm when other reporters have focused on his assertion that 'phone's don't lie' and that in RA's case his phone shows he had left by 2.15pm (we await the evidence backing this up to be presented of course).
Other MOO -
The defense has predictably come with things it previously hasn't emphasised or made much of. As above lets see the evidence.
Conversely the prosecution has kept in its opening to things we largely expected - the 3 Bs that Nick has focused the juries attention upon etc.
However what I would dearly love to see now is the mountain of evidence that it has been alleged was held back from the PCA to overwhelmingly prove the state's case in court.
Let's see the truth first, backed by weight of evidence, before justice is decided and dispensed.
For the avoidance of doubt, all MOO.