- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 12,219
- Reaction score
- 137,859
It already is.This is why it is bad to have to depend on individual reporters in this case.
—one reporter describes the branches on top of the girls as being placed as “vees” and shapes, hinting that there was a purpose to them
—others reporters just say that branches were placed on top of them. Nothing more.
That first reporter will stir up a lot cr#p with that statement on a subject that the Judge has already ruled irrelevant. He knows what he’s doing.
:0(