Real quick Google search confirms.No feral hogs in Indiana that I’m aware of. Just my opinion
Real quick Google search confirms.No feral hogs in Indiana that I’m aware of. Just my opinion
I think that the bullet is important- very important- it was found at a brutal crime scene-
The bullet introduced as evidence, is consistent with a bullet that has been cycled through the accused weapon- that is also very important
The questions around when and how the bullet was collected, was retained, was tested (for markings), and was compared to a bullet cycling through the accused weapon are the places that I personally as a juror would have had questions- not being anything but a novice on IN law, chain of custody of evidence, and or the art and science of bullet markings I would want to know more details- which many people have graciously helped me personally understand-
Asking if hunting is allowed in the area is a good question and thinking about how else a bullet might have ended up where it was is also valid- I don’t think that means people lack critical thinking skills, wear tin hats, or eat conspiracy theories for breakfast
In the southeast where guns are very common and people getting framed isn’t in the ancient past, asking questions about the bullet, chain of custody, testing and timelines all seem logical in any given context … all my own opinions
It doesn’t actually matter- but wild hogs have been in southern Indiana counties since late 90’sReal quick Google search confirms.
I’m interested in hearing from the expert on possibilities.Lol no that is not true.
Just my opinion
Not that it matters, but because I was curious:No feral hogs in Indiana that I’m aware of. Just my opinion
Wild hogs—also called wild pigs, wild boar, or feral swine—are an invasive species in Indiana.
“there’s no path here, we got to go down here” is very interesting to me.
No mention of a gun being chambered as we have heard in rumors. Very interested in the rest of today’s testimony.
JMO
But there are other methods , part of standard protocol, which can also prove it is the same bullet. We will hear that when COC staff testifies.
When the forensics team is collecting the evidence, they have a lot of things to track. Not just the bullet. They are responsible for a tremendous amount of things to do and they are not going to take EXTRA, NON PROTOCOL steps while in the process of doing their job.
The person who collected the bullet was not looking for marks upon th bullet so would not be focused upon that aspect. Those marks were discovered AT THE LAB. So the man at the crime scene had no idea he should take extra pictures of something he knew nothing about and couldn't even see. He is just trying not to ruin and potential DNA or fingerprint evidence. IMO
60+ confessions by Richard Allen may go a long way towards clearing up any reasonable doubt.And there in lies the problem.
You can’t convict someone based on what some witnesses recall they may have been wearing (which none of them even agreed upon, there were differing reports of what BG was wearing) this is where reasonable doubt comes in.
JMO
Not that it matters, but because I was curious:
Feral / Wild Hog
Feral / Wild Hog in Indiana, including food habits, family life, habitat and population by Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish & Wildlifewww.in.gov
Yes, "preponderance of the evidence.. beyond a reasonable doubt"Every single piece of evidence could be an issue theoretically.
Just my opinion
Maybe he wanted them closer together so he could throw branches on them both,in one smaller area?Why did the suspect drag Libby 7-8 feet across the crime scene when she was dying, bleeding out, nearly decapitated? Abby had her neck cut and she died on the spot, not so with Libby. Why was she dragged, bleeding on trees and leaves? What was the suspect thinking?
My source is the Indiana government.That doesn’t sound correct. Might want to check your source. Here is what I found.
The Indiana state director for Wildlife Services at USDA says there has not been a confirmed sighting of a wild pig in the state for more than two years.
The Indiana DNR says there is no established population of wild hogs in Indiana.
I’ve never seen one
Just my opinion
My family owned a slaughter house. They used .38 revolver to kill hogs up close..40 caliber hand guns are used often times for hog hunting
Mine is the USDA and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources.My source is the Indiana government.
I don’t think the difficult part of this case for the prosecution will be proving that BG = Killer.
I think it will be proving BG = RA
Especially given that no one positively identified BG as RA and the differing witness descriptions of who they saw.
JMO
I grabbed a screenshot of the drawing @MassGuy
I’m really looking forward to seeing if these are coherent and corroborating confessions or haldol fueled gibberish.60+ confessions by Richard Allen may go a long way towards clearing up any reasonable doubt.
jmo
I think the earlier “anxiety” poster is correct. He wanted to rewind a bit, clean it up. Hence redress who he could. The sticks are shame.Maybe he wanted them closer together so he could throw branches on them with,in one smaller area?
My family owned a slaughter house. They used .38 revolver to kill hogs up close.
Hunting those feral pigs tearing up woods in the past couple of decades my nephew used an AR 15. I can't remember what Paul Murdaugh used but I think it was a comparable high powered rifle.
I'm not expert on hog hunting but I'd want to make sure I could stop a full grown hog with one shot.
I don't know the law in IN but where I am I'd be packing if I were out in the woods. And yes at 14 years old I could make a beer can dance with a 44 magnum. My brothers taught me well!
In fact, when I moved to teach in IN I was sent with said 44 for protection.
Sorry a bit of topic....but if Abby and Libby had protection. Never thought about that until now . The world is so different now.