Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #202

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I'm also wondering now what is being considered as 'devices' ... phones, tablets for sure. Laptops? iTunes (what are those called lol... iPods! Sorry ), fitness devices...smart TVs? That could all add up if we're being technical.

So, thinking back, myself and my ex, 2 kids. 4 phones for sure. Tablets, 2 of us but could be 4 in a different family. 2 or more iPods. Then we replace phones/tablets every year or two depending on your cell service specials. So 4 phones make 8 in a few years time. We never traded them in. A fitbit. (I have a Fitbit I'm wearing plus my two previous sitting in a drawer...what do I do with them??). I could see it adding up to 23 in several years depending on what they're looking at. I probably have 15 "devices" in my house currently, old and current, depending on what counts as a "device". I can see it.

More curious about devices active during the timeframe of the crime. That IMO tells a story. If some are missing, then why? Is RA's phone missing (sounds like it wasn't recovered), but for example his wife's from that timeframe is there? Why? ...is my question.

Good questions and it makes sense to think about it and everything in its entirety, if possible.

I would think the same as you plus lap tops, cameras, hard drives, dash cams, smart watches ...anything electronic really that records and stores data, audio or film.

JMO MOO JMT
 
I really don’t know the answer. Are needle marks visible post mortem? What about having them drink a drink with something in it? Or a rag over mouth with a substance soaked into it? Questions again, not opinions. Ty.

The point is we don't know because as it stands currently, no tox screen was done, or that we know about.

Same with the stomach contents.
 
Why was he shown crime scene photos at all? Is this standard practice in most murder cases to show crime scene photo to the autopsy person just before trial? I am a new trial follower so this is not an opinion, it’s a question! Ty in advance.

The ME typically travels to the crime scene for assessment and to collect the bodies. It does not appear he did that. He generally takes his own autopsy photos, and I'm not sure he used his own photos or only diagrams during his testimony. We know the jurors saw crime scene photos.

State's 19th witness: Dr. Roland Kohr, who performed the autopsies​

Kohr said he was called on Feb. 14, 2017, to perform the autopsies, which he did on Feb. 15, 2017.

 
Holy moly. SC stated an amber alert is what brought her in. Three days later.

There was no amber alert. Wonder if defense has caught this yet.
SC may have been responding to the Amber Alert that was sent out for a different teen. There was public confusion the day Libby and Abby went missing about the Amber Alert process. Unsure why she would have waited 3 days, though.

By: Audra Levy
Posted 12:39 PM, Feb 14, 2017
and last updated 4:11 PM, Feb 15, 2017

“15-year-old Chastinea Reeves of Gary was found safe Tuesday after an Amber Alert was issued. Gary police said Monday that Reeves had been abducted and they believed that she might be in extreme danger, therefore her disappearance met the criteria of an alert.”

 
Another question: Robert ives I think once told the media that they felt this would be solved fairly quickly with old school police methods and never explained why aside to say based on the evidence they had at the scene - I’m just wondering, does anyone feel we know what he was on about yet?

“I go back before DNA and cell phones,” said Ives who remembered prosecuting criminal cases in Carroll County with less evidence than in this case since 1987, “and I certainly would have said, if experienced investigators, as we have in this case, had the evidence that was available in this case, I would expect them to solve it within a month. That’s without DNA and cell phones which are a big part of what’s going on here.”

 
This makes me sick to write - but the abrasion on Abby’s chin, it’s not sticky like tape but a red abrasion I believe. Possibly a goatee rubbing, especially if it was a short stubbly kind? If he was close to her to cut her, he was close enough to kiss. Ugh.

Edit to add: or a rough glove to hold her still?

Just thinking aloud. JMO
IMO,
No. The possibilities mentioned in testimony today were it was from possibly duct tape or cloth. Moooooo.
 
I wondered this earlier as well! Amber alert - one article said she heard it on Feb 13 but why? When the police had no reason to think the kids had been abducted yet?? They wouldn’t know this until the 14th!


Amber alert criteria for Indiana:

They didn’t know the kids were abducted AND in danger of serious harm or death on the 13th.
@JAY CLUCK

I suspect that she saw the Alerts going out 3 days later with the photo from Libby's phone that was seeking people to call the tipline. They came out that day.

Here's a link to BG showing up here way back on 16th February 2017:


 
Not when it's February in Indiana and the ground is frozen. And with the leaf and tree cover in that area it would definitely be frozen due to less sunlight. We've already had.the first frost here. JMO

Yes, but:

a) February 13, 2017 was an exceptionally warm day, as we’ve been informed since the beginning, and:

b) blood leaving the body is 98.6°, which will cool after awhile.

It’s my opinion that they lost most of their blood so quickly that the warm blood combined with the warm day allowed the blood to penetrate and saturate the ground.

Also, the experts who combed through the crime scene said it was saturated with the girls’ blood. I believe them.

We will have to agree to disagree.

 
<modsnip - quoted post was removed (insinuations against non-POI)

I only found out this year (July or August) about the possibility of a sharp weapon being used.

Has it always been known that something like a knife was used in this case?

JMQ = Just My Question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but:

a) February 13, 2017 was an exceptionally warm day, as we’ve been informed since the beginning, and

b) blood leaving the body is 98.6, which will cool after awhile.

It’s my opinion that they lost most of their blood so quickly that the warm blood combined with the warm day allowed the blood to penetrate and saturate the ground.

Also, the experts who combed through the crime scene said it was saturated with the girls’ blood. I believe them.

We will have to agree to disagree.

I couldn't agree more, thank you for putting it in such effective terms.

I have laid down on snow, for a long time, and all the snow under me melted and at some point I realised I was lying down on a slurry of mud. Everywhere else the ground was dry, frozen, crisp. That's basic 1+1 = 2, IMO.

All MOO.
 
<modsnip - quoted post and response was removed (insinuations against non-POI)


In regards to this “unusual knife” thing. Even the pathologist apparently didn’t think so in his reports. He did initially believe the knife could have been serrated, before changing his opinion to the weapon possibly being a box cutter.

So if law enforcement said the knife was unusual it was an interpretation of what the ME said.

Personally, if this knife was a box cutter, I do think that’s an unusual weapon.

I don’t think I’ve followed a case where one has been used, and my only reference point is 9/11. We know they are very effective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This makes me sick to write - but the abrasion on Abby’s chin, it’s not sticky like tape but a red abrasion I believe. Possibly a goatee rubbing, especially if it was a short stubbly kind? If he was close to her to cut her, he was close enough to kiss. Ugh.

Edit to add: or a rough glove to hold her still?

Just thinking aloud. JMO
I would think they’d find his DNA on her skin if he rubbed or kissed her. IMO
 
Yes, I remember. What does that have to do with my post? I was pointing out to the poster I replied to Libby's phone did not turn off at 10:32 pm so it wouldn't keep.getting passed around as fact when it isn't.
Your post was also talking about "so many dumps" of her phone being done. I linked you to the testimony on the dumps. There was not "so many" and when it was re-analysed in Aug 2024, it was because the data program had been updated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
3,219
Total visitors
3,318

Forum statistics

Threads
621,477
Messages
18,433,588
Members
239,638
Latest member
flowers5ymkgzlbhvp
Back
Top