Snipped.
I agree. For such an "ordinary" looking person without particularly distinguishing features, he looks different from photo to photo....and police artist sketches!
jmo
It may be a typical question asked.Hahahahah. I’d just love to know how that even came up. Like what question brought that out?
In my limited experience in a civil and in a criminal case, it was facts but presented from a point of view.Yes but was it like an opening statement or like just the facts, no spin either way?
I’m not an expert so I can’t answer those questions, I guess it would depend on the type of SA etc.The theory that the girls were molested may not be supported by autopsy findings, however, because the girls were found unclothed, except Abby who had been redressed, can there really be any doubt about them being molested by RA? JMO
Wow! 6 before lunch is amazing!
I doubt any jurors have been “seated” yet, but have been selected to the group where attorneys will eventually go through their peremptory challenges. Not sure how many each side are allowed in Indiana.So when they word it as 6 POTENTIAL jurors have been seated does that mean they are jurors or not? That word potential is not clear. Is it because some will be alternates or is this just narrowing down the 300 to a smaller group and then they are selected from that group? Maybe I'm over thinking this.. lol
A relief for sure. Fingers crossed for justice for Libby and Abby!Wow! I wondered if 300 potential jurors would be enough, but I'm not worried now. They are MOVING.
Feels so strange after all this time that the pace is clipping now.
jmo
Just to clear things up, this isn’t a death penalty case.I doubt any jurors have been “seated” yet, but have been selected to the group where attorneys will eventually go through their peremptory challenges. Not sure how many each side are allowed in Indiana for a death penalty case.
moo
what do you mean?Just to clear things up, this isn’t a death penalty case.
JMO
Either that or a clever ploy to be freed up for the next 5 to 6 weeks?? JMHOPsychic no doubt foresaw their dismissal last night.
Thanks, fixed my postJust to clear things up, this isn’t a death penalty case.
JMO
Praying these jurors get to know Libby and Abby, the joy of them, not just the ending <3
From the hearings, I came away thinking he certainly shamed and humiliated them by making them undress, a certain assault in my mind. Something made him change his mind about Abby, at some point, he let her cover up. I think he then mortally wounded and incapacitated her causing Libby to fight and flee. That's when the slashing attack on Libby began and that struggle ended by the tree, with him then dragging her back to where she started her flight. Whether anything was done after death, we only know he covered Libby half way with leaves and both somewhat with branches.The theory that the girls were molested may not be supported by autopsy findings, however, because the girls were found unclothed, except Abby who had been redressed, can there really be any doubt about them being molested by RA? JMO
I appreciate your fact-based answers so much!12 jurors & 4 alternates will selected & will be sworn in per Gull on 10/17.
I agree. If and when that statement is explained by the person who heard, it will have context.I absolutely agree with this.
In the back of my mind, I also can't 100% discount the possibility that the gun portion of one of the confessions was a case of "telephone" game" by the person who heard. For example, if he said "I pushed the gun into one girl's back" (to control her) but what the hearer later told people was "I shot one girl in the back" out of simple mishearing or just wrong assumptions.
Only 4 for such a long trial. Hope that's enough alternates.12 jurors & 4 alternates will selected & will be sworn in per Gull on 10/17.