We all have differing opinions on what reasonable is. My time needed has only stretched since trial began, as two sharp edged weapons were used I learned from day 1 of trial, one serrated one not was also possibly mentioned, I only read about serrated in one report so not sure if that is what was testified too.Thanks. So we don't know how much time the killer used during this crime. I don't see why an hour is not enough time. And I don't see why less than that would unreasonable. JMO.
Thank you for your reply, that really helped me understand and answer the questions about the markings -They kept that quiet so when they did have a person of interest they could possibly get the gun and compare the tool markings then. They use a microcscope. It's a shame we can't hear this evidence because it is fascinating. I've listened to experts in other cases that were tasked with comparing the bullets and it is in my opinion very much like fingerprinting.
I am not as confident in the ethics of LE as you,LE doesn' just say "take my word for it" ...
They give sworn testimony, under oath, under penatly of fine and/or imprisonment for committing perjury.
Just as the did yesterday.
Why did the suspect drag Libby 7-8 feet across the crime scene when she was dying, bleeding out, nearly decapitated? Abby had her neck cut and she died on the spot, not so with Libby. Why was she dragged, bleeding on trees and leaves? What was the suspect thinking?
We don’t know if there was another person “down the hill” waiting for them.The amount of things one perpetrator had to have done in the amount of time he had will always astound me, just getting the two girls down the hill to the spot he needed to get them to cross the river took time, as they wouldn't have any idea where he was directing them too (and over time I think the "down the hill" comment may be a product of LE enhancing the words on the recording and if we watched the video as is we may not dicipher any words) and he would have had to keep directing them to where he wanted them to go.
Then everything else that was done, I will always struggle with the time unless the perpetrator talks and explains in detail how it was done and RA could be that perpetrator, I am at present on the fence about him when pre trial I was a little surer.
NoIn the quest for justice for the girls, I have to wonder if the “masses” would be willing to have the wrong person held accountable vs no one held accountable
I wasn’t saying I believed it, it was more to the point that if the chain of custody had been broken or not as documented as it should have been for the bullet at the crime scene, how might a similar bullet which did match RA’s gun come into existence and end up as evidence in this case
I wasn’t saying that I believed that RA was framed or contemplating better ways to frame him, I was fixating on the bullet markings and if with sloppy chain of custody of original bullet could a new bullet which was cycled through the gun have been relatively easy to create-
I don’t believe that is what happened and OP have provided me with articles and information to better understand both chain of custody for evidence as well as the background for analyzing bullets- this is a very difficult and strange case-
trying to understand the unfamiliar aspects
Moo
Their conclusion looks a little different from yours, though.The error rate is higher for unfired rounds. The reliability of the test is completely subjective; it is only reliable as the examiner.
Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners - PMC
This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
We all have differing opinions on what reasonable is. My time needed has only stretched since trial began, as two sharp edged weapons were used I learned from day 1 of trial, one serrated one not was also possibly mentioned, I only read about serrated in one report so not sure if that is what was testified too.
Plus the only evidence that a gun was present during crimes is it is supposedly heard on Libby's video, I am really looking forward to that testimony, if defence motion in limine is successful and the jury is to rely on what they hear on the video not what state tells them is on there then maybe some of the jury don't hear the word gun, and if the defence is able to argue that there is no evidence a gun was used during crimes then the bullet which is the only thing putting him at crime scene becomes less relevant IMO
If the search warrant was in Oct 2022 before RA was arrested wouldn’t that be when they got the gun to test it against? It’s an actual question not an opinion - ty in advance.How does one test a bullet before one has a weapon to test it against?
Is the sport of hunting permitted in that area?I think it is very important to show all aspects of collection, how it looked when removed from ground, very good close up of it after removal with any markings and manufacturers stamps noted and taken. photos of this removes any doubt as to this is the cartridge we found and removed and placed and sealed in evidence bag on scene.
Not doing so leaves doubts as we can't be expected to solely rely on LE saying take my word for it this is the bullet as most people want to be sure the evidence is exactly what they say it is.
I apologize if it came across that I was suggesting that people on WS were the “masses” I was referring to other online media threads and comments- where it seems like at times people are ready to just assume guilty in the name of “justice” and closureMany of us are invested in justice for Abby and Libby. I believe I am speaking for the "masses". Not one person I've chatted with is willing to convict anyone other than the person that is guilty of killing Libby and Abby.
I'm not making conclusions; I'm waiting until I hear from the specific toolmark analyst in this trial. I am only pointing out the statistics here because the 1% error rate you note is (1) misleading, because that statistic is for a cartridge, not a unfired round; (2) the study and the numbers associated with it come from a pool of "a total of 173 qualified forensic firearms examiners made 8640 comparisons" and not the entirely of comparisons ever made; and (3) "Each examiner has an individual error probability" and "the majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners."Their conclusion looks a little different from yours, though.
“The results of this study add to the ever increasing body of empirical data that firearms examiners conduct comparisons with a high level of accuracy.”
I remember “endless” discussions about thisMany people identified the imprint of a gun, which obviously made logical sense in regards to how one man could control two teen girls.
I would doubt it, and almost no one hunts with that round.Is the sport of hunting permitted in that area?